once more i have come to paris and now i am one of the habitués of the rue de fleurus. gertrude stein was writing the making of americans and she had just commenced correcting the proofs of three lives. i helped her correct them. gertrude stein was born in allegheny, pennsylvania. as i am an ardent californian and as she spent her youth there i have often begged her to be born in california but she has always remained firmly born in allegheny, pennsylvania. she left it when she was six months old and has never seen it again and now it no longer exists being all of it pittsburgh. she used however to delight in being born in allegheny, pennsylvania when during the war, in connection with war work, we used to have papers made out and they always immediately wanted to know one’s birth-place. she used to say if she had been really born in california as i wanted her to have been she would never have had the pleasure of seeing he various french officials try to write, allegheny, pennsylvania,

when i first knew gertrude stein in paris i was surprised never to see a french book on her table, although there were always plenty of english ones, there were even no french newspapers. but do you never read french, i as well as many other people asked her. no, she replied, you see i feel with my eyes and it does not make any difference to me what language i hear, i don’t hear a language, i hear tones of voice and rhythms, but with my eyes i see words and sentences and there is for me only one language and that is english. one of the things that i have liked all these years is to be surrounded by people who know no english. it has left me more intensely alone with my eyes and my english. i do not know if it would have been possible to have english be so all in all to me otherwise. and they none of them could read a word i wrote, most of them did not even know that i did write. no, i like living with so very many people and being all alone with english and myself.

one of her chapters in the making of americans begins: i write for myself and strangers.

she was born in allegheny, pennsylvania, of a very respectable middle class family. she always says that she is very grateful not to have been born of an intellectual family, she has a horror of what she calls intellectual people. it has always been rather ridiculous that she who is good friends with all the world and can know them and they can know her, has always been the admired of the precious. but she always says some day they, anybody, will find out that she is of interest to them, she and her writing. and she always consoles herself that the newspapers are always interested. they always say, she says, that my writing is appalling but they always quote it and what is more, they quote it correctly, and those they say they admire they do not quote. this at some of her most bitter moments has been a consolation. my sentences do get under their skin, only they do not know that they do, she has often said.

she was born in allegheny, pennsylvania, in a house, a twin house. her family lived in one and her father’s brother’s family lived in the other one. these two families are the families described in the making of americans. they had lived in these houses for about eight years when gertrude stein was born. a year before her birth, the two sisters-in-law who had never gotten along any too well were no longer on speaking terms.

gertrude stein’s mother as she describes her in the making of americans, a gentle pleasant little woman with a quick temper, flatly refused to see her sister-in-law again. i don’t know quite what had happened but something. at any rate the two brothers who had been very successful business partners broke up their partnership, the one brother went to new york where he and all his family after him became very rich and the other brother, gertrude stein’s family, went to europe. they first went to vienna and stayed there until gertrude stein was about three years old. all she remembers of this is that her brother’s tutor once, when she was allowed to sit with her brothers at their lessons, described a tiger’s snarl and that that pleased and terrified her. also that in a picture-book that one of her brothers used to show her there was a story of the wanderings of ulysses who when sitting sat on bent-wood dining room chairs. also she remembers that they used to play in the public gardens and that often the old kaiser francis joseph used to stroll through the gardens and sometimes a band played the austrian national hymn which she liked. she believed for many years that kaiser was the real name of francis joseph and she never could come to accept the name as belonging to anybody else.

they lived in vienna for three years, the father having in the meanwhile gone back to america on business and then they moved to paris. here gertrude stein has more lively memories. she remembers a little school where she and her elder sister stayed and where there was a little girl in the corner of the school yard and the other little girls told her not to go near her, she scratched. she also remembers the bowl of soup with french bread for breakfast and she also remembers that they had mutton and spinach for lunch and as she was very fond of spinach and not fond of mutton she used to trade mutton for spinach with the little girl opposite. she also remembers all of her three older brothers coming to see them at the school and coming on horse-back. she also remembers a black cat jumping from the ceiling of their house at passy and scaring her mother and some unknown person rescuing her.

the family remained in paris a year and then they came back to america. gertrude stein’s elder brother charmingly describes the last days when he and his mother went shopping and bought everything that pleased their fancy, seal skin coats and caps and muffs for the whole family from the mother to the small sister gertrude stein, gloves dozens of gloves, wonderful hats, riding costumes, and finally ending up with a microscope and a whole set of the famous french history of zoology. then they sailed for america.

this visit to paris made a very great impression upon gertrude stein. when in the beginning of the war, she and i having been in england and there having been caught by the outbreak of the war and so not returning until october, were back in paris, the first day we went out gertrude stein said, it is strange, paris is so different but so familiar. and then reflectively, i see what it is, there is nobody here but the french (there were no soldiers or allies there yet), you can see the little children in their black aprons, you can see the streets because there is nobody on them, it is just like my memory of paris when i was three years old. the pavements smell like they used (horses had come back into use), the smell of french streets and french public gardens that i remember so well.

they went back to america and in new york, the new york family tried to reconcile gertrude stein’s mother to her sister-in-law but she was obdurate.

this story reminds me of miss etta cone, a distant connection of gertrude stein, who typed three lives. when i first met her in florence she confided to me that she could forgive but never forget. i added that as for myself i could forget but not forgive. gertrude stein’s mother in this ease was evidently unable to do either.

the family went west to california after a short stay in baltimore at the home of her grandfather, the religious old man she describes in the making of americans, who lived in an old house in baltimore with a large number of those cheerful pleasant little people, her uncles and her aunts.

gertrude stein has never ceased to be thankful to her mother for neither forgetting or forgiving. imagine, she has said to me, if my mother had forgiven her sister-in-law and my father had gone into business with my uncle and we had lived and been brought up in new york, imagine, she says, how horrible. we would have been rich instead of being reasonably poor but imagine how horrible to have been brought up in new york.

i as a californian can very thoroughly sympathise.

and so they took the train to california. the only thing gertrude stein remembers of this trip was that she and her sister had beautiful big austrian red felt hats trimmed each with a beautiful ostrich feather and at some stage of the trip her sister leaning out of the window had her hat blown off. her father rang the emergency bell, stopped the train, got the hat to the awe and astonishment of the passengers and the conductor. the only other thing she remembers is that they had a wonderful hamper of food given them by the aunts in baltimore and that in it was a marvellous turkey. and that later as the food in it diminished it was renewed all along the road whenever they stopped and that that was always exciting. and also that somewhere in the desert they saw some red indians and that somewhere else in the desert they were given some very funny tasting peaches to eat.

when they arrived in california they went to an orange grove but she does not remember any oranges but remembers filling up her father’s cigar boxes with little limes which were very wonderful.

they came by slow stages to san francisco and settled down in oakland. she remembers there the eucalyptus trees seeming to her so tall and thin and savage and the animal life very wild. but all this and much more, all the physical life of these days, she has described in the life of the hers-land family in her making of americans. the important thing to tell about now is her education.

her father having taken his children to europe so that they might have the benefit of a european education now insisted that they should forget their french and german so that their american english would be pure. gertrude stein had prattled in german and then in french but she had never read until she read english. as she says eyes to her were more important than ears and it happened then as always that english was her only language.

her bookish life commenced at this time. she read anything that was printed that came her way and a great deal came her way. in the house were a few stray novels, a few travel books, her mother’s well bound gift books wordsworth scott and other poets, bunyan’s pilgrim’s progress a set of shakespeare with notes, burns, congressional records encyclopedias etcetera. she read them all and many times. she and her brothers began to acquire other books. there was also the local free library and later in san francisco there were the mercantile and mechanics libraries with their excellent sets of eighteenth century and nineteenth century authors. from her eighth year when she absorbed shakespeare to her fifteenth year when she read clarissa harlowe, fielding, smollett etcetera and used to worry lest in a few years more she would have read everything and there would be nothing unread to read, she lived continuously with the english language. she read a tremendous amount of history, she often laughs and says she is one of the few people of her generation that has read every line of carlyle’s frederick the great and lecky’s constitutional history of england besides charles grandison and wordsworth’s longer poems. in fact she was as she still is always reading. she reads anything and everything and even now hates to be disturbed and above all however often she has read a book and however foolish the book may be no one must make fun of it or tell her how it goes on. it is still as it always was real to her.

the theatre she has always cared for less. she says it goes too fast, the mixture of eye and ear bothers her and her emotion never keeps pace. music she only cared for during her adolescence. she finds it difficult to listen to it, it does not hold her attention. all of which of course may seem strange because it has been so often said that the appeal of her work is to the ear and to the subconscious. actually it is her eyes and mind that are active and important and concerned in choosing.

life in california came to its end when gertrude stein was about seventeen years old. the last few years had been lonesome ones and had been passed in an agony of adolescence. after the death of first her mother and then her father she and her sister and one brother left california for the east. they came to baltimore and stayed with her mother’s people. there she began to lose her lonesomeness. she has often described to me how strange it was to her coming from the rather desperate inner life that she had been living for the last few years to the cheerful life of all her aunts and uncles. when later she went to radcliffe she described this experience in the first thing she ever wrote. not quite the first thing she ever wrote. she remembers having written twice before. once when she was about eight and she tried to write a shakespearean drama in which she got as far as a stage direction, the courtiers making witty remarks. and then as she could not think of any witty remarks gave it up.

the only other effort she can remember must have been at about the same age. they asked the children in the public schools to write a description. her recollection is that she described a sunset with the sun going into a cave of clouds. anyway it was one of the half dozen in the school chosen to be copied out on beautiful parchment paper. after she had tried to copy it twice and the writing became worse and worse she was reduced to letting some one else copy it for her. this, her teacher considered a disgrace. she does not remember that she herself did.

as a matter of fact her handwriting has always been illegible and i am very often able to read it when she is not.

she has never been able or had any desire to indulge in any of the arts. she never knows how a thing is going to look until it is done, in arranging a room, a garden, clothes or anything else. she cannot draw anything. she feels no relation between the object and the piece of paper. when at the medical school, she was supposed to draw anatomical things she never found out in sketching how a thing was made concave or convex. she remembers when she was very small she was to learn to draw and was sent to a class. the children were told to take a cup and saucer at home and draw them and the best drawing would have as its reward a stamped leather medal and the next week the same medal would again be given for the best drawing. gertrude stein went home, told her brothers and they put a pretty cup and saucer before her and each one explained to her how to draw it. nothing happened. finally one of them drew it for her. she took it to the class and won the leather medal. and on the way home in playing some game she lost the leather medal. that was the end of the drawing class.

she says it is a good thing to have no sense of how it is done in the things that amuse you. you should have one absorbing occupation and as for the other things in life for full enjoyment you should only contemplate results. in this way you are bound to feel more about it than those who know a little of how it is done.

she is passionately addicted to what the french call métier and she contends that one can only have one métier as one can only have one language. her métier is writing and her language is english.

observation and construction make imagination, that is granting the possession of imagination, is what she has taught many young writers. once when hemingway wrote in one of his stories that gertrude stein always knew what was good in a cézanne, she looked at him and said, hemingway, remarks are not literature.

the young often when they have learnt all they can learn accuse her of an inordinate pride. she says yes of course. she realises that in english literature in her time she is the only one. she has always known it and now she says it.

she understands very well the basis of creation and therefore her advice and criticism is invaluable to all her friends. how often have i heard picasso say to her when she has said something about a picture of his and then illustrated by something she was trying to do, racontez-moi cela. in other words tell me about it. these two even to-day have long solitary conversations. they sit in two little low chairs up in his apartment studio, knee to knee and picasso says, expliquez-moi cela. and they explain to each other. they talk about everything, about pictures, about dogs, about death, about unhappiness. because picasso is a spaniard and life is tragic and bitter and unhappy. gertrude stein often comes down to me and says, pablo has been persuading me i that i am as unhappy as he is. he insists that i am and with as much cause. but are you, i ask. well i don’t think i look it, do i, and she laughs. he says, she says, that i don’t look it because i have more courage, but i don’t think i am, she says, no i don’t think i am.

and so gertrude stein having been in baltimore for a winter and having become more humanised and less adolescent and less lonesome went to radcliffe. there she had a very good time.

she was one of a group of harvard men and radcliffe women and they all lived very closely and very interestingly together. one of them, a young philosopher and mathematician who was doing research work in psychology left a definite mark on her life. she and he together worked out a series of experiments in automatic writing under the direction of münsterberg. the result of her own experiments, which gertrude stein wrote down and which was printed in the harvard psychological review was the first writing of hers ever to be printed. it is very interesting to read because the method of writing to be afterwards developed in three lives and making of americans already shows itself.

the important person in gertrude stein’s radcliffe life was william james. she enjoyed her life and herself. she was the secretary of the philosophical club and amused herself with all sorts of people. she liked making sport of question asking and she liked equally answering them. she liked it all. but the really lasting impression of her radcliffe life came through william james.

it is rather strange that she was not then at all interested in the work of henry james for whom she now has a very great admiration and whom she considers quite definitely as her forerunner, he being the only nineteenth century writer who being an american felt the method of the twentieth century. gertrude stein always speaks of america as being now the oldest country in the world because by the methods of the civil war and the commercial conceptions that followed it america created the twentieth century, and since all the other countries are now either living, or commencing to be living a twentieth century of life, america having begun the creation of the twentieth century in the sixties of the nineteenth century is now the oldest country in the world.

in the same way she contends that henry james was the first person in literature to find the way to the literary methods of the twentieth century. but oddly enough in all of her formative period she did not read him and was not interested in him. but as she often says one is always naturally antagonistic to one’s parents and sympathetic to one’s grandparents. the parents are too close, they hamper you, one must be alone. so perhaps that is the reason why only very lately gertrude stein reads henry james.

william james delighted her. his personality and his teaching and his way of amusing himself with himself and his students all pleased her. keep your mind open, he used to say, and when some one objected, but professor james, this that i say, is true. yes, said james, it is abjectly true.

gertrude stein never had subconscious reactions, nor was she a successful subject for automatic writing. one of the students in the psychological seminar of which gertrude stein, although an undergraduate was at william james’ particular request a member, was carrying on a series of experiments on suggestions to the subconscious. when he read his paper upon the result of his experiments, he began by explaining that one of the subjects gave absolutely no results and as this much lowered the average and made the conclusion of his experiments false he wished to be allowed to cut this record out. whose record is it, said james. miss stein’s, said the student. ah, said james, if miss stein gave no response i should say that it was as normal not to give a response as to give one and decidedly the result must not be cut out.

it was a very lovely spring day, gertrude stein had been going to the opera every night and going also to the opera in the afternoon and had been otherwise engrossed and it was the period of the final examinations, and there was the examination in william james’ course. she sat down with the examination paper before her and she just could not. dear professor james, she wrote at the top of her paper. i am so sorry but really i do not feel a bit like an examination paper in philosophy to-day, and left.

the next day she had a postal card from william james saying, dear miss stein, i understand perfectly how you feel i often feel like that myself. and underneath it he gave her work the highest mark in his course.

when gertrude stein was finishing her last year at radcliffe, william james one day asked her what she was going to do. she said she had no idea. well, he said, it should be either philosophy or psychology. now for philosophy you have to have higher mathematics and i don’t gather that that has ever interested you. now for psychology you must have a medical education, a medical education opens all doors, as oliver wendell holmes told me and as i tell you. gertrude stein had been interested in both biology and chemistry and so medical school presented no difficulties.

there were no difficulties except that gertrude stein had never passed more than half of her entrance examinations, for radcliffe, having never intended to take a degree. however with considerable struggle and enough tutoring that was accomplished and gertrude stein entered johns hopkins medical school.

some years after when gertrude stein and her brother were just beginning knowing matisse and picasso, william james came to paris and they met. she went to see him at his hotel. he was enormously interested in what she was doing, interested in her writing and in the pictures she told him about. he went with her to her house to see them. he looked and gasped, i told you, he said, i always told you that you should keep your mind open.

only about two years ago a very strange thing happened. gertrude stein received a letter from a man in boston. it was evident from the letter head that he was one of a firm of lawyers. he said in his letter that he had not long ago in reading in the harvard library found that the library of william james had been given as a gift to the harvard library. among these books was the copy of three lives that gertrude stein had dedicated and sent to james. also on the margins of the book were notes that william james had evidently made when reading the book. the man then went on to say that very likely gertrude stein would be very interested in these notes and he proposed, if she wished, to copy them out for her as he had appropriated the book, in other words taken it and considered it as his. we were very puzzled what to do about it. finally a note was written saying that gertrude stein would like to have a copy of william james’ notes. in answer came a manuscript the man himself had written and of which he wished gertrude stein to give him an opinion. not knowing what to do about it all, gertrude stein did nothing.

after having passed her entrance examinations she settled down in baltimore and went to the medical school. she had, a servant named lena and it is her story that gertrude stein afterwards wrote as the first story of the three lives.

the first two years of the medical school were alright. they were purely laboratory work and gertrude stein under llewelys barker immediately betook herself to research work. she began a study of all the brain tracts, the beginning of a comparative study. all this was later embodied in llewelys barker’s book. she delighted in doctor mall, professor of anatomy, who directed her work. she always quotes his answer to any student excusing him or herself for anything. he would look reflective and say, yes that is just like our cook. there is always a reason. she never brings the food to the table hot. in summer of course she can’t because it is too hot, in winter of course she can’t because it is too cold, yes there is always a reason. doctor mall believed in everybody developing their own technique. he also remarked, nobody teaches anybody anything, at first every student’s scalpel is dull and then later every student’s scalpel is sharp, and nobody has taught anybody anything.

these first two years at the medical school gertrude stein liked well enough. she always liked knowing a lot of people and being mixed up in a lot of stories and she was not awfully interested but she was not too bored with what she was doing and besides she had quantities of pleasant relatives in baltimore and she liked it. the last two years at the medical school she was bored, frankly openly bored. there was a good deal of intrigue and struggle among the students, that she liked, but the practice and theory of medicine did not interest her at all. it was fairly well known among all her teachers that she was bored, but as her first two years of scientific work had given her a reputation, everybody gave her the necessary credits and the end of her last year was approaching. it was then that she had to take her turn in the delivering of babies and it was at that time that she noticed the negroes and the places that she afterwards used in the second of the three lives stories, melanctha herbert, the story that was the beginning of her revolutionary work.

as she always says of herself, she has a great deal of inertia and once started keeps going until she starts somewhere else.

as the graduation examinations drew near some of her professors were getting angry. the big men like halstead, osler etcetera knowing her reputation for original scientific work made the medical examinations merely a matter of form and passed her. but there were others who were not so amiable. gertrude stein always laughed, and this was difficult. they would ask her questions although as she said to her friends, it was foolish of them to ask her, when there were so many eager and anxious to answer. however they did question her from time to time and as she said, what could she do, she did not know the answers and they did not believe that she did not know them, they thought that she did not answer because she did not consider the professors worth answering. it was a difficult situation, as she said, it was impossible to apologise and explain to them that she was so bored she could not remember the things that of course the dullest medical student could not forget. one of the professors said that although all the big men were ready to pass her he intended that she should be given a lesson and he refused to give her a pass mark and so she was not able to take her degree. there was great excitement in the medical school. her very close friend marion walker pleaded with her, she said, but gertrude gertrude remember the cause of women, and gertrude stein said, you don’t know what it is to be bored.

the professor who had flunked her asked her to come to see him. she did. he said, of course miss stein all you have to do is to take a summer course here and in the fall naturally you will take your degree. but not at all, said gertrude stein, you have no idea how grateful i am to you. i have so much inertia and so little initiative that very possibly if you had not kept me from taking my degree i would have, well, not taken to the practice of medicine, but at any rate to pathological psychology and you don’t know how little i like pathological psychology, and how all medicine bores me. the professor was completely taken aback and that was the end of the medical education of gertrude stein.

she always says she dislikes the abnormal, it is so obvious. she says the normal is so much more simply complicated and interesting.

it was only a few years ago that marion walker, gertrude stein’s old friend, came to see her at bilignin where we spend the summer. she and gertrude stein had not met since those old days nor had they corresponded but they were as fond of each other and disagreed as violently about the cause of women as they did then. not, as gertrude stein explained to marion walker, that she at all minds the cause of women or any other cause but it does not happen to be her business.

during these years at radcliffe and johns hopkins she often spent the summers in europe. the last couple of years her brother had been settled in florence and now that everything medical was over she joined him there and later they settled down in london for the winter.

they settled in lodgings in london and were not uncomfortable. they knew a number of people through the berensons, bertrand russell, the zangwills, then there was willard ( josiah flynt) who wrote tramping with tramps, and who knew all about london pubs, but gertrude stein was not very much amused. she began spending all her days in the british museum reading the elizabethans. she returned to her early love of shakespeare and the elizabethans, and became absorbed in elizabethan prose and particularly in the prose of. greene. she had little note-books full of phrases that pleased her as they had pleased her when she was a child. the rest of the time she wandered about the london streets and found them infinitely depressing and dismal. she never really got over this memory of london and never wanted to go back there, but in nineteen hundred and twelve she went over to see john lane, the publisher and then living a very pleasant life and visiting very gay and pleasant people she forgot the old memory and became very fond of london.

she always said that that first visit had made london just like dickens and dickens had always frightened her. as she says anything can frighten her and london when it was like dickens certainly did.

there were some compensations, there was the prose of greene and it was at this time that she discovered the novels of anthony trollope, for her the greatest of the victorians. she then got together the complete collection of his work some of it difficult to get and only obtainable in tauchnitz and it is of this collection that robert coates speaks when he tells about gertrude stein lending books to young writers. she also bought a quantity of eighteenth century memoirs among them the creevy papers and walpole and it is these that she loaned to bravig imbs when he wrote what she believes to be an admirable life of chatterton. she reads books but she is not fussy about them, she cares about neither editions nor make-up as long as the print is not too bad and she is not even very much bothered about that. it was at this time too that, as she says, she ceased to be worried about there being in the future nothing to read, she said she felt that she would always somehow be able to find something.

but the dismalness of london and the drunken women and children and the gloom and the lonesomeness brought back all the melancholy of her adolescence and one day she said she was leaving for america and she left. she stayed in america the rest of the winter. in the meantime her brother also had left london and gone to paris and there later she joined him. she immediately began to write. she wrote a short novel.

the funny thing about this short novel is that she cornpletely forgot about it for many years. she remembered herself beginning a little later writing the three lives but this first piece of writing was completely forgotten, she had never mentioned it to me, even when i first knew her. she must have forgotten about it almost immediately. this spring just two days before our leaving for the country she was looking for some manuscript of the making of americans that she wanted to show bernard fay and she came across these two carefully written volumes of this completely forgotten first novel. she was very bashful and hesitant about it, did not really want to read it. louis bromfield was at the house that evening and she handed him the manuscript and said to him, you read it.