the hedge and bank in haye lane are now a perfect tangled mass of creeping plants, among which i have just picked out a queer little three-cornered flower, hardly known even to village children, but christened by our old herbalists 'dog's mercury.' it is an ancient trick of language to call coarser or larger plants by the specific title of some smaller or cultivated kind, with the addition of an animal's name. thus we have radish and horse-radish, chestnut and horse-chestnut, rose and dog-rose, parsnip and cow-parsnip, thistle and sow-thistle. on the same principle, a somewhat similar plant being known as mercury, this perennial weed becomes dog's mercury. both, of course, go back to some imaginary medicinal virtue in the herb which made it resemble the metal in the eyes of old-fashioned practitioners.

dog's mercury is one of the oddest english flowers i know. each blossom has three small green petals, and either several stamens, or else a pistil, in the centre. there is nothing particularly remarkable in the flower being green, for thousands of other flowers are green and we never notice them as in any way unusual. in fact, we never as a rule notice green blossoms at all. yet anybody who picked a piece of dog's mercury could not fail to be struck by its curious appearance. it does not in the least resemble the inconspicuous green flowers of the stinging-nettle, or of most forest trees: it has a very distinct set of petals which at once impress one with the idea that they ought to be coloured. and so indeed they ought: for dog's mercury is a degenerate plant which once possessed a brilliant corolla and was fertilised by insects, but which has now fallen from its high estate and reverted to the less advanced mode of fertilisation by the intermediation of the wind. for some unknown reason or other this species and all its relations have discovered that they get on better by the latter and usually more wasteful plan than by the former and usually more economical one. hence they have given up producing large bright petals, because they no longer need to attract the eyes of insects; and they have also given up the manufacture of honey, which under their new circumstances would be a mere waste of substance to them. but the dog's mercury still retains a distinct mark of its earlier insect-attracting habits in these three diminutive petals. others of its relations have lost even these, so that the original floral form is almost completely obscured in their case. the spurges are familiar english roadside examples, and their flowers are so completely degraded that even botanists for a long time mistook their nature and analogies.

the male and female flowers of dog's mercury have taken to living upon separate plants. why is this? well, there was no doubt a time when every blossom had both stamens and pistil, as dog-roses and buttercups always have. but when the plant took to wind fertilisation it underwent a change of structure. the stamens on some blossoms became aborted, while the pistil became aborted on others. this was necessary in order to prevent self-fertilisation; for otherwise the pollen of each blossom, hanging out as it does to the wind, would have been very liable to fall upon its own pistil. but the present arrangement obviates any such contingency, by making one plant bear all the male flowers and another plant all the female ones. why, again, are the petals green? i think because dog's mercury would be positively injured by the visits of insects. it has no honey to offer them, and if they came to it at all, they would only eat up the pollen itself. hence i suspect that those flowers among the mercuries which showed any tendency to retain the original coloured petals would soon get weeded out, because insects would eat up all their pollen, thus preventing them from fertilising others; while those which had green petals would never be noticed and so would be permitted to fertilise one another after their new fashion. in fact, when a blossom which has once depended upon insects for its fertilisation is driven by circumstances to depend upon the wind, it seems to derive a positive advantage from losing all those attractive features by which its ancestors formerly allured the eyes of bees or beetles.

here, again, on the roadside is a bit of plantain. everybody knows its flat rosette of green leaves and its tall spike of grass-like blossom, with long stamens hanging out to catch the breeze. now plantain is a case exactly analogous to dog's mercury. it is an example of a degraded blossom. once upon a time it was a sort of distant cousin to the veronica, that pretty sky-blue speedwell which abounds among the meadows in june and july. but these particular speedwells gave up devoting themselves to insects and became adapted for fertilisation by the wind instead. so you must look close at them to see at all that the flowering spike is made up of a hundred separate little four-rayed blossoms, whose pale and faded petals are tucked away out of sight flat against the stem. yet their shape and arrangement distinctly recall the beautiful veronica, and leave one in little doubt as to the origin of the plant. at the same time a curious device has sprung up which answers just the same purpose as the separation of the male and female flowers on the dog's mercury. each plantain blossom has both stamens and pistils, but the pistils come to maturity first, and are fertilised by pollen blown to them from some neighbouring spike. their feathery plumes are admirably adapted for catching and utilising any stray golden grain which happens to pass that way. after the pistils have faded, the stamens ripen, and hang out at the end of long waving filaments, so as to discharge all their pollen with effect. on each spike of blossoms the lower flowerets open first; and so, if you pick a half-blown spike, you will see that all the stamens are ripe below, and all the pistils above. were the opposite arrangement to occur, the pollen would fall from the stamens to the lower flowers of the same stalk; but as the pistils below have always been fertilised and withered before the stamens ripen, there is no chance of any such accident and its consequent evil results. thus one can see clearly that the plantain has become wholly adapted to wind-fertilisation, and as a natural effect has all but lost its bright-coloured corolla.

common groundsel is also a case of the same kind; but here the degradation has not gone nearly so far. i venture to conjecture, therefore, that groundsel has been embarked for a shorter time upon its downward course. for evolution is not, as most people seem to fancy, a thing which used once to take place; it is a process taking place around us every day, and it must necessarily continue to take place to the end of all time. by family the groundsel is a daisy; but it has acquired the strange and somewhat abnormal habit of self-fertilisation, which in all probability will ultimately lead to its total extinction. hence it does not need the assistance of insects; and it has accordingly never developed or else got rid of the bright outer ray-florets which may once have attracted them. its tiny bell-shaped blossoms still retain their dwarf yellow corollas; but they are almost hidden by the green cup-like investment of the flower-head, and they are not conspicuous enough to arrest the attention of the passing flies. here, then, we have an example of a plant just beginning to start on the retrograde path already traversed by the plantain and the spurges. if we could meet prophetically with a groundsel of some remote future century, i have little doubt we should find its bell-shaped petals as completely degraded as those of the plantain in our own day.

the general principle which these cases illustrate is that when flowers have always been fertilised by the wind, they never have brilliant corollas; when they acquire the habit of impregnating their kind by the intervention of insects, they almost always acquire at the same time alluring colours, perfumes, and honey; and when they have once been so impregnated, and then revert once more to wind-fertilisation, or become self-fertilisers, they generally retain some symptoms of their earlier habits, in the presence of dwarfed and useless petals, sometimes green, or if not green at least devoid of their former attractive colouring. thus every plant bears upon its very face the history of its whole previous development.