to the theosophical publication society:

it is with great regret that i learn from recent london advices that the managers of the society there think that the tract, "epitome of theosophy," which appeared in the path, is "too advanced to be reprinted now, and that what is needed is 'a stepping-stone from fiction to philosophy.'"

permit me to say that i cannot agree with this opinion, nor with the policy which is outlined by it. the opinion is erroneous, and the policy is weak as well as being out of accord with that of the masters. those masters have approved the project of the new society and are watching the unfolding of its policy.

if i had made up that epitome wholly myself i24 might have some hesitation in speaking in this way, but i did not. the general idea of such a series of tracts was given to me some two years ago, and this one was prepared by several students who know what the people need. it is at once comprehensive and fundamental. it covers most of the ground, and if any sincere reader grasps it he will have food for his reflection of the sort needed.

if, however, we are to proceed by a mollified passage from folly (which is fiction) to philosophy, then we at once diverge from the path marked out for us by the masters; and for this statement i can refer to letters from them in my hands. i need only draw your attention to the fact that when those masters began to cause their servants to give out matter in india, they did not begin with fiction, but with stern facts such as are to be found in the fragments of occult truth, which afterwards became mr. sinnett's esoteric buddhism. we are not seeking to cater to a lot of fiction readers and curiosity hunters, but to the pressing needs of earnest minds. fiction readers never influenced a nation's progress. and these earnest minds do not desire, and ought not to be treated to a gruel which the sentence just quoted would seem to indicate as their fate.

then again, i beg to remind my english brothers in this enterprise that they should remember that the united states contain more theosophists and possible subscribers and readers than the whole of europe. they do not want fiction. they want no padding in their search for truth. they are perfectly able to grasp that which you call "too advanced." the master some years ago said that the u. s. needed the help of the english body of theosophists. that they did not get, and now do not require it so much, and their ideas and needs must be considered by us. we have twenty-one branches to your three in great britain,25 and each month, nearly, sees a new branch. several have written me that they understand the t.p.s. is to give them good and valuable reprints and not weak matters of fiction.

i therefore respectfully urge upon you that the weak and erroneous policy to which i have referred shall not be followed, but that strong lines of action be taken, and that we leave fiction to the writers who profit by it or who think that thus people's minds can be turned to the truth. if a contrary line be adopted then we will not only disappoint the master (if that be possible) but we will in a very large sense be guilty of making false representations to a growing body of subscribers here as well as elsewhere.

i am, fraternally yours,

william q. judge.