he room was small, and hung with a smoke-stained paper dating from the pontificate of pio nono. ancient lithographs were dependent from the walls, representing cavour with his tortoise-shell-framed spectacles and collar-like beard, the leonine visage of garibaldi, the stupendous moustaches of victor emanuel, a classic placing side by side of the combined symbols of the revolution and of the supreme power, a popular testimony to the italian spirit which excels in juxtapositions, and in whose midst, in our own day, in rome, the fulminating pope and the excommunicated king daily exchange assurances of good-neighbourship, with an exquisite grasp of politics, and not without a certain flavour of delicate comedy. the mahogany sideboard was laden with plated chafing-dishes and alabaster goblets. the establishment affected for new things a contempt appropriate to long-standing renown.

seated around a table bedecked with roses, and with flasks of chianti before them, the five continued their philosophic discourse.

“it is quite true,” said nicole langelier, “that the heart fails in the case of many men, when gazing into the abyss of future events. it is moreover certain that our all too imperfect knowledge of facts past and gone does not supply us with the elements required to enable us to determine accurately what is to succeed them. however, since the past of human social organisations is in part known to us, the future of those societies, a continuation and consequence of their past, is not wholly beyond our ken. it is not impossible to observe certain social phenomena, and to define from the conditions under which they have already occurred, the conditions under which they will reappear. we are not barred, when witnessing the commencement of an order of facts, from comparing it with a past order of analogous facts, and from deducing from the completion of the second a like completion of the first. by way of example: when observing that the forms of labour are changeable, that serfdom has succeeded slavery, salaried labour, serfdom, new methods of production may be anticipated; when it is shown that industrial capital has for barely a century taken the place of the small artisans and peasant property, one is led to ponder over the form which is to succeed capital; when studying the manner in which was carried out the redemption of the feudal burdens and conditions of servitude, one is enabled to conceive how the redemption of the means of production nowadays constituting private ownership may some day be carried out. by studying the great services of the state now in operation, it is possible to form a conception of future socialistic methods of production; and, after having thus investigated in several respects the present and the past of human industry, we shall, lacking certainties, determine by aid of probabilities whether collectivism is to be realised some day, not because it is just, for there is no reason for believing in the triumph of justice, but because it is the necessary sequel to the present state of things, and the fatal consequence of capitalistic evolution.

“let us, if you like, take another example: we possess some experience of the life and death of religions. the end of roman polytheism in particular, is familiar to us. its lamentable end enables us to imagine that of christianity, whose decline we are witnessing.

“we may similarly seek to find out whether future humanity will be bellicose or peaceful.”

“i am curious to learn,” said joséphin leclerc, “how to set about it.”

m. goubin shook his head, saying:

“such a quest is useless. we know its result beforehand. war will last as long as the world.”

“there is nothing to prove it,” replied langelier, “and a consideration of the past leads one to believe, on the contrary, that war is not one of the essential conditions of social life.”

and langelier, while waiting for the minestra (soup) which was long in making its appearance, developed the foregoing idea, without, however, departing from the moderation characterising his mind.

“although the early periods of the human race,” he said, “are lost to us in impenetrable darkness, it is certain that men were not always warlike. they were not so during the long ages of the pastoral life; the memory of which survives only in a small number of words common to all indo-european languages, and which reveal innocent manners. and there are reasons for believing that these peaceful pastoral centuries had a far longer duration than the agricultural, industrial, and commercial periods which, following them in a necessary progress, brought about between tribes and nations a state of all but constant war.

“it was by force of arms that it was most frequently sought to acquire property, lands, women, slaves, and cattle. at first, wars were waged between village and village. next, the vanquished, joining hands with the victors, formed a nation, and wars occurred between nation and nation. each of these peoples, in order to retain possession of the acquired riches, or to make further acquisitions, contended with neighbouring peoples for the possession of strongholds securing the command of roads, mountain passes, river courses, and the seashore. in the end, nations formed confederations, and contracted alliances. thus it came about that men banded together; as they increased in strength, instead of contending for the goods of the earth, formally bartered them. the community of sentiments and interests gradually became broadened. a day came when rome imagined she had established it the world over. augustus thought he had inaugurated the era of universal peace.

“we know how this illusion was gradually and savagely dissipated, and how the barbarian hordes overwhelmed the roman peace. these barbarians, who had settled within the empire, cut one another’s throats on its ruins, for a space of fourteen centuries, and founded in carnage countries baptized in blood. of such was the life of nations in the middle ages, and the constitution of the great european monarchies.

“in those days, a state of war was alone possible and conceivable. all the forces of the world were organised solely for the purpose of maintaining it.

“if the reawakening of thought, at the time of the renaissance, permitted a few sparse minds to conceive better regulated relations between nations, at one and the same time, the burning desire to invent, and the thirst for knowledge supplied fresh food to the warrior instinct. the discovery of the west indies, the exploration of africa, the navigation of the pacific ocean, opened up vast territories to european avidity. the white kingdoms joined issue over the extermination of the red, yellow, and black races, and for the space of four centuries gave themselves up madly to the pillaging of three great divisions of the world. this is what is styled modern civilisation.

“during this uninterrupted succession of deeds of rapine and violence, europeans acquired a knowledge of the extent and configuration of the earth. as they progressed in this knowledge, so did their work of destruction proceed apace. to the present day, the whites come in contact with the black or the yellow races but to enslave or massacre them. the peoples whom we call barbarians know us so far through our crimes only.

“for all that, those navigations, those explorations undertaken in a spirit of savage cupidity, these tracks by land and by sea opened up to conquerors, adventurers, hunters of and traders in men, these life-destroying colonisations, this brutal impulse which has led and still leads one-half of humanity to destroy the other, are the fatal conditions of a further progress of civilisation, and the terrible means which shall have prepared, for a still undetermined future, the peace of the world.

“this time, ’tis the whole world assimilated, in spite of enormous dissimilarities, to the state of the roman empire under augustus. the roman peace was the fruit of conquest. universal peace will most assuredly not be brought about by the same means. no empire is there to-day which can lay claim to the hegemony of the lands and seas covering the globe, known and surveyed at last. but, in spite of their being less apparent than those of political and military domination, the bonds which are beginning to unite the whole of humanity, and no longer merely a part of humanity, are none the less real; they are both more supple and more solid, more intimate and infinite in variety, since they are connected, athwart the fictions of public life, with the realities of social life.

“the increasing multiplicity of communications and exchanges, the compulsory solidarity of the financial markets of every capital, of commercial markets vainly striving to guarantee their independence by recourse to unfortunate expedients, the rapid growth of international socialism, seem likely to guarantee, sooner or later, the union of the peoples of every continent. if at the present moment the imperialist spirit of the great states and the haughty ambitions of armed nations seem to give the lie to these previsions, and to damn these aspirations, it will be perceived that in reality modern nationalism amounts merely to a confused aspiration towards a more and more vast union of intellects and wills, and that the dream of a greater england, a greater germany, a greater america, leads, will or do whatever you may, to the dream of a greater humanity, and to a partnership between nations for the common exploitation of the riches of the earth....”

the speech was interrupted by the appearance of the tavern-keeper bearing a steaming soup-tureen and grated cheese.

and, from amid the hot and aromatic vapour of the soup, nicole langelier concluded his argument with these words:

“there will doubtless be further wars. the savage instincts coupled with the natural desires, pride and hunger, which have embroiled the world for so many centuries, will again disturb it. the human masses have so far not found their equilibrium. the sagacity of nations is not yet sufficiently methodical to secure the common welfare, by means of the freedom and the facility of exchanges, man has so far not come to be looked up to with respect everywhere by man, the several portions of humanity are not yet about to associate harmoniously for the purpose of building the cells and organs of one and the same body. it will not be vouchsafed even unto the youngest of us to witness the close of the era of arms. but, we feel within us a presentiment of these better times which we are not to experience. if we extend into the future the present trend, we may even now determine the establishment of more perfect and frequent communications between all races and all nations, a more general and stronger feeling of human solidarity, the rational organisation of labour, and the coming of the united states of the world.

“universal peace will become a fact some day, not because men will become better (’tis more than we may hope for), but because a new order of things, a new science, and new economic necessities will force on men the state of peace, just as formerly the very conditions of their existence placed and kept them in a state of war.”

“nicole langelier, a rose has shed a leaf in your glass,” said giacomo boni. “this has not taken place without the permission of the gods. let us drink to the future peace of the world.”

raising his glass, joséphin leclerc remarked:

“this wine of chianti has a tart savour, and a light sparkle. let us drink to peace, the while russians and japanese are waging a bitter war in manchuria and in korea bay.”

“that war,” resumed langelier, “marks one of the great periods in the history of the world. and, in order to grasp its meaning, we must hark back two thousand years.

“the romans, assuredly, did not suspect the vastness of the barbarian world, and had no conception of those immense human reservoirs which were to burst on them one fine day, and submerge them. they did not suspect that there existed in the world any other than the roman peace. and yet, an older and vaster one there was, the chinese peace.

“not but what their merchants had business relations with the merchants of serica. the latter were wont to bring raw silk to a spot situated to the north of the pamir table-land, named the tower of stone. the merchants of the empire went thither. bolder latin traders penetrated as far as the gulf of tong-king and the chinese coasts up to hang-chau-fu, or hanoi. nevertheless, the romans did not conceive that serica constituted an empire more densely populated than their own one, richer, and more advanced in agriculture and political economy. the chinese, on their part, knew the white men. their annals mention the fact that the emperor an-tung, under which name we recognise marcus aurelius antoninus, despatched an embassy to them, which was perhaps merely an expedition of navigators and merchants. but they were ignorant of the fact that a civilisation more seething and violent than their own, as well as more prolific and infinitely more expansive, was spread over one of the faces of the globe of which they covered another face: the chinese, agriculturists and gardeners full of experience, honest and expert merchants, led a happy life, owing to their system of exchange and to their immense associations of credit. contented with their subtle science, their exquisite politeness, their singularly human piety, and their immutable wisdom, they were doubtless not anxious to become acquainted with the ways of life and thought of the white men who had come from the land of c?sar. perchance the ambassadors of an-tung may have seemed somewhat gross and barbarian to them.

“the two great civilisations, the yellow and the white, continued ignorant of each other until the day when the portuguese, having doubled the cape of good hope, settled down to trade at macao. merchants and christian missionaries established themselves in china, and indulged in every kind of violence and rapine. the chinese tolerated them, in the manner of men accustomed to works of patience, and marvellously capable of endurance; nevertheless, they could on occasion take life with all the refinements of cruelty. for nearly three whole centuries the jesuits were, in the middle kingdom, a source of endless disturbances. in our own times, the christian acquired the habit of sending jointly or separately into that vast empire, whenever order was disturbed, soldiers who restored it by means of theft, rape, pillage, murder, and incendiarism, and of proceeding at short intervals with the pacific penetration of the country with rifles and guns. the poorly armed chinese either defend themselves badly or not at all, and so they are massacred with delightful facility. they are polite and ceremonious, but are reproached with cherishing feeble sentiments of affection for europeans. the grievances we have against them are greatly of the order of those which mr. du chaillu cherished towards his gorilla. mr. du chaillu, while in a forest, brought down with his rifle the mother of a gorilla. in its death, the brute was still pressing its young to its bosom. he tore it from this embrace, and dragged it with him in a cage across africa, for the purpose of selling it in europe. now, the young animal gave him just cause for complaint. it was unsociable, and actually starved itself to death. ‘i was powerless,’ says mr. du chaillu, ‘to correct its evil nature.’ we complain of the chinese with as great a show of reason as mr. du chaillu of his gorilla.

“in 1901, order having been disturbed at peking, the troops of the five great powers, under the command of a german field-marshal, restored it by the customary means. having in this fashion covered themselves with military glory, the five powers signed one of the innumerable treaties by which they guarantee the integrity of the very china whose provinces they divide among themselves.

“russia’s share was manchuria, and she closed korea to japanese trade. japan, which in 1894 had beaten the chinese on land and on sea, and had taken a part, in 1901, in the pacifying action of the powers, saw with concentrated fury the advance of the voracious and slow-footed she-bear. and, while the huge brute indolently stretched out its muzzle towards the japanese beehive, the yellow bees, arming their wings and stings together, riddled it with burning punctures.

“‘it is a colonial war,’ was the expression used by a high-placed russian official to my friend georges bourdon.[d] now, the fundamental principal of every colonial war is that the european should be more powerful than the peoples whom he is fighting; this is as clear as noonday. it is understood that in these kinds of wars the european is to attack with artillery, while the asiatic or african is of course to defend himself with arrows, clubs, assegais and tomahawks. it is tolerated that he should procure a few antiquated flint-locks and cartridge-pouches; this aids in rendering colonisation more glorious. but in no case is it permissible that he should be armed and instructed in european fashion. his fleet must consist of junks, canoes and ‘dug-outs.’ should he perchance purchase ships from european ship-owners, such ships shall naturally be unfit for use. the chinese who fill their arsenals with porcelain shells conform to the rules of colonial warfare.

[d] m. georges bourdon, journalist, on the staff of le figaro.

“the japanese have departed from these rules. they wage war in accordance with the principles taught in france by general bonnal. they greatly outweighed their adversaries in knowledge and intelligence. while fighting better than europeans, they show no respect for consecrated usages, and act to a certain degree in a fashion contrary to the law of nations.

“’tis in vain that serious individuals like monsieur edmond théry[e] demonstrated to them that they were bound to be beaten, in the superior interest of the european market and in conformity with the most firmly established economic laws. vainly did the proconsul of indo-china, monsieur doumer himself, call upon them to suffer, and at short notice, decisive defeats on sea and on land. ‘what a financial sadness would bow down our hearts,’ exclaimed this great man, ‘were bezobrazoff and alexeieff not to extract another million out of the korean forests. they are kings. like them, i was a king: our cause is a common one. oh ye japanese! imitate in their gentleness the copper-coloured folk over whom i reigned so gloriously under méline.’ in vain did dr. charles richet,[f] skeleton in hand, represent to them that being prognathous, and not having the muscles of their calves sufficiently developed, they were under the obligation of seeking flight in the trees when face to face with the russians, who are brachycephalous and as such eminently civilising, as was demonstrated when they drowned five thousand chinese in the amur. ‘bear in mind that you are links between monkey and man,’ obligingly said to them my lord professor richet, ‘as a consequence of which, if you should defeat the russians or finno-letto-ugro-slavs, it would be exactly as if monkeys were to beat you. is it not plain to you?’ they heeded him not.

[e] m. edmond théry, journalist, on the staff of le figaro. has been entrusted by the french government with several politico-economic missions; author of several works in this connection.

[f] dr. charles richet, a noted physician, who has written plays, and is the author of several works on physiology and sociology.

“at the present moment, the russians are paying the penalty, in the waters of japan and in the gorges of manchuria, not only of their grasping and brutal policy in the east, but of the colonial policy of all europe. they are now expiating, not merely their own crimes, but those of the whole of military and commercial christianity. when saying this, i do not mean to say that there is a justice in the world. but we witness a strange whirligig of things, and brute force, up to now the sole judge of human actions, indulges occasionally in unexpected pranks. its sudden starts aside destroy an equilibrium thought to be stable. and its pranks, which are ever the work of some hidden rule, bring about interesting results. the japanese cross the yalu and defeat the russians in good form. their sailors annihilate artistically a european fleet. immediately do we discern that a danger threatens us. if it indeed exists, who created it? it was not the japanese who sought out the russians. it was not the yellow men who hunted up the whites. we there and then make the discovery of a yellow peril. for many long years have asiatics been familiar with the white peril. the looting of the summer palace, the massacres of pekin, the drownings of blagovestchenk, the dismemberment of china, were these not enough to alarm the chinese? as to the japanese, could they feel secure under the guns of port arthur? we created the white peril. the white peril has engendered the yellow peril. we have here concatenations giving to the ancient necessity which rules the world an appearance of divine justice, and must perforce admire the astonishing behaviour of that blind queen of men and gods, when seeing japan, formerly so cruel to the chinese and koreans, and the unpaid accessory to the crimes of europeans in china, become the avenger of china, and the hope of the yellow race.

“it does not, however, appear at first sight that the yellow peril at which european economists are terrified is to be compared to the white peril suspended over asia. the chinese do not send to paris, berlin, and st. petersburg missionaries to teach christians the fung-chui, and sow disorder in european affairs. a chinese expeditionary force did not land in quiberon bay to demand of the government of the republic extra-territoriality, i.e., the right of trying by a tribunal of mandarins cases pending between chinese and europeans. admiral togo did not come and bombard brest roads with a dozen battleships, for the purpose of improving japanese trade in france. the flower of french nationalism, the élite of our trublions, did not besiege in their mansions in the avenues hoche and marceau the legations of china and of japan, and marshal oyama did not, for the same reason, lead the combined armies of the far east to the boulevard de la madeleine to demand the punishment of the foreigner-hating trublions. he did not burn versailles in the name of a higher civilisation. the armies of the great asiatic powers did not carry away to tokio and peking the louvre paintings and the silver service of the elysée.

“no indeed! monsieur edmond théry himself admits that the yellow men are not sufficiently civilised to imitate the whites so faithfully. nor does he foresee that they will ever rise to so high a moral culture. how could it be possible for them to possess our virtues? they are not christians. but men entitled to speak consider that the yellow peril is none the less to be dreaded for all that it is economic. japan, and china organised by japan, threaten us, in all the markets of europe, with a competition frightful, monstrous, enormous, and deformed, the mere idea of which causes the hair of the economists to stand on end. that is why japanese and chinese must be exterminated. there can be no doubt about the matter. but war must also be declared against the united states to prevent it from selling iron and steel at a lower price than our manufacturers less well equipped in machinery.

“let us for once admit the truth, and for a moment cease flattering ourselves. old europe and new europe—for that is america’s true name—have inaugurated economic war. each and every nation is waging an industrial struggle against the others. everywhere does production arm itself furiously against production. we are displaying bad grace when we complain that we are witnessing fresh competing and disturbing products invade the market of the world thus thrown into confusion. of what use are our lamentations? that might is right is our god. if tokio is the weaker, it shall be in the wrong and it shall be made to feel it; if it is the stronger, right will be on its side, and we shall have no reproach to cast at it. where is the nation in the world entitled to speak in the name of justice?

“we have taught the japanese both the capitalistic régime and war. they are a cause of alarm because they are becoming like ourselves. in truth, it is awful. they dare to defend themselves with european weapons against europeans. their generals, their naval officers, who have studied in england, in germany, and in france, reflect honour on their instructors. several of them have followed the classes of our special military schools. the russian grand dukes, who feared that no good could come out of military institutions too democratic to their taste, must feel reassured.

“i am unable to foretell the issue of the war. the russian empire opposes to the methodical energy of the japanese its irresolute forces which the savage imbecility of its government restrains, the dishonesty of a voracious administration robs, and military incapacity leads to disaster. the stupendousness of its impotence and the depths of its disorganisation stand revealed. withal, its golden reservoirs, kept filled by its rich creditors, are all but inexhaustible. on the other hand, its enemy has no other resources than onerous loans obtained with difficulty, of which victory itself may perchance deprive them. for while english and americans are one in assisting it to weaken russia, they do not intend that it shall become powerful and to be feared. it is hard to predict the final victory of one combatant over the other. but if japan makes the yellow men respected by the white men, it will have greatly served the cause of humanity, and paved the way unawares and doubtless against its own wish for the pacific organisation of the world.”

“what do you mean,” said m. goubin, raising his eyes from his plate filled with a savoury fritto.

“it is feared,” continued nicole langelier, “that japan grown to manhood will educate china, teach it to defend itself and to exploit its wealth itself, and that japan will create a strong china. no need to look upon such a contingency with alarm; it should, on the contrary, be hoped for in the universal interest. strong nations co-operate to the harmony and wealth of the world. weak nations, like china and turkey, are a perpetual cause of disturbances and perils. but we are ever in too great a haste in our fears and hopes. should victorious japan undertake to organise the old yellow empire, it will not succeed in its task that quickly. it will require time to teach china that a china exists. for she knows it not, and as long as she is unaware of it, there will not be any china. a people exists only in the knowledge possessed by it of its existence. there are 350,000,000 chinese, but they are not aware of the fact. as long as they have not counted themselves, they will not count for anything. they will not even exist by dint of numbers. ‘number off!’ is the first word of command spoken by the drill-sergeant to his men. he is there and then teaching them the principle of societies. but it takes a long time for 350,000,000 men to number themselves. nevertheless, ular, who is a european out of the common, since he believes that one should be humane and just towards the chinese, informs us that a great national movement is simmering in all the provinces of the huge empire.”

“and even should it happen,” said joséphin leclerc, “that victorious japan came to infuse into mongols, chinese, and tibetans a consciousness of themselves, and caused them to be respected by the white races, in what way would the peace of the world be better assured, and the conquering mania of nations be kept within stricter bounds? would not negro humanity still remain to be exterminated? where is the black nation which will insure the respecting of negroes by the white and yellow races?”

“but,” interposed nicole langelier, “who can define how far one of the great human races may go? the blacks are not, like the red man, dying out through contact with the europeans. where is the prophet who will venture to tell the 200,000,000 african blacks that their posterity will never enjoy wealth and peace on the lakes and great rivers? the white men passed through the ages of caves and lacustrine villages. they were at that time wild and naked. they dried rude potteries in the sun. their chiefs led barbarian dances at which they shouted. they knew no other sciences than those of their sorcerers. since those days they have built the parthenon, conceived geometry, subjected the expression of their thought and the motions of their body to the laws of harmony.

“are you then going to say to the african negroes: ‘you shall for ever carry on an internecine war between tribe and tribe, and you shall inflict upon one another atrocities and absurd tortures; king gléglé, permeated with a religious idea, shall for all time have prisoners tied up in a basket and thrown from the roof of his royal hut; you shall for ever devour with enjoyment the strips of flesh torn from the decomposed cadavers of your aged relations; for ever shall explorers unload their rifles on you, and smoke you out in your kraals; the wonderful christian soldier will enjoy in his bravery the amusement of hacking your women to pieces; the gay and festive sailor from the befogged seas shall for all time kick in the bellies of your little children, just to take the stiffness out of his knee-joints? can you safely prophesy to one-third of humanity a state of perpetual ignominy?

“i am unable to say whether one day, as mrs. beecher stowe predicted in 1840, a life will awaken in africa full of a splendour and magnificence unknown to the cold-blooded races of the west, and whether art will blossom forth in new and dazzling forms. the blacks possess a keen appreciation of music. it may happen that a delightful negro art of dance and song shall see the light of day. in the meanwhile, the coloured folk of the southern states are making rapid strides in capitalistic civilisation. monsieur jean finot[g] has recently supplied us with information on the subject.

[g] m. jean finot, editor of la revue, and contributor to several french and european publications.

“fifty years ago they did not, as a whole, own two hundred and fifty acres of land. nowadays their property is valued at over ￡160,000,000. they were illiterate. to-day fifty per cent. of them can read and write. there are black novelists, poets, economists, and philanthropists.

“the half-breeds, the issue of master and slave, are singularly intelligent and vigorous. the coloured men, both cunning and ferocious, instinctive and calculating, will gradually (so one of them has confided to me) reap the advantage of number, and one day lord it over the effeminate creole race which exercises so lightly over the blacks its fitful cruelty. it may be that the mulatto of genius, who will make the children of the whites pay dearly the blood of the negroes lynched by their fathers, is already born.”

m. goubin primed himself with his powerful eye-glass, and remarked:

“were the japanese to be victorious, they would take indo-china from us.”

“thereby rendering us a great service,” answered langelier. “colonies are the curse of nations.”

m. goubin’s indignant silence was his sole reply.

“i cannot listen to such statements,” exclaimed joséphin leclerc. “we require outlets for our products, and territories for our industrial and commercial expansion. what are you thinking of, langelier? one policy alone governs europe, america, and the world to-day—colonial policy.”

nicole langelier, unruffled, replied:

“colonial policy is the most recent form of barbarism, or, if you prefer, the term of civilisation. i make no distinction between these two expressions; they are identical. what men call civilisation is the present condition of manners, while what they style barbarism are anterior conditions. the manners of to-day will be styled barbarian when they shall be of the past. it is patent to me that our manners and morals embody the idea that strong nations shall destroy the weaker ones. of such is the principle of the law of nations.

“it remains to be seen, however, whether conquests abroad always constitute a good stroke of business for nations. it would not seem so. what have mexico and peru done for spain? brazil for portugal? batavia for holland? there are various kinds of colonies. there are colonies which afford to unfortunate europeans desert and uncultivated lands. these, loyal as long as they remain poor, separate from the mother country as soon as they become prosperous. some there are which are inhabitable; these supply raw material, and import manufactured goods. now it is plain that these colonies enrich, not those who govern them, but whoever trades with them. the greater part of the time they are not worth what they cost. moreover, they may at any moment expose the mother country to military disasters.”

“how about england?” interrupted m. goubin.

“england is less a nation than a race. the anglo-saxons know no fatherland but the sea. england, looked upon as wealthy in her vast domains, owes her fortune and her power to her commerce. it is not her colonies which should be envied her, but her merchants, the authors of her wealth. do you imagine, by way of illustration, that the transvaal represents so very good a stroke of business for her? for all that, it is conceivable that in the present state of the world nations who bring forth many children and manufacture products in large quantities should seek territories and markets in far-off lands, and secure possession of them by stratagem and violence. how different it is in our own case! our thrifty nation, careful not to have more children than the natal soil can feed without difficulty, and producing in a moderate degree, does not willingly embark on distant adventures; our france, who hardly goes beyond her garden wall, great heavens, what need has she of colonies? of what use are they to her? what do they bring her? she has spent men and money in profusion, in order that the congo, cochin-china, annam, tonking, guiana, and madagascar shall purchase calicoes from manchester, guns from birmingham and liége, brandies from dantzig, and cases of wine all the way from bordeaux to hamburg. she has, for seventy years, despoiled, hunted, and shot down arabs, and in the end she has peopled algeria with italians and spaniards!

“the irony of these results is cruel enough, and it is hard to realise that this empire, ten or eleven times as big as france herself, has been formed to our detriment. but, it must be taken into consideration that whereas the french nation derives no advantage whatsoever from the possession of territories in africa and asia, the heads of its government, on the other hand, find it to their great advantage to acquire them. they thereby secure the affection of the navy and army, which on the occasion of colonial expeditions reap a harvest of promotions, pensions, and crosses, to say nothing of the glory won in defeating the enemy. they conciliate the clergy by opening new paths to the propaganda, and by allocating territories to catholic missions. they make joyous the ship-owners, builders, and army contractors, whom they load with orders. they secure for themselves in the country itself a numerous following by the granting of concessions of immense forests and plantations without end. and, what is still more precious to them, they attach to their majority every parliamentary jobber and kerbstone-broker. lastly, they cajole the multitude, proud in its possession of a yellow and black empire, which makes germany and england turn green with envy. they are looked upon as good citizens, patriots, and great statesmen. and if, like ferry, they incur the risk of going under, as the result of some military disaster, they willingly run the risk fully convinced that the most harmful of distant expeditions will cost them fewer difficulties, and will inveigle them into fewer perils than the most useful of social reforms.

“you can now realise why we have occasionally had imperialist ministers, jealous of aggrandising our colonial domain. we must congratulate ourselves, however, and praise the moderation of our rulers, who might have burdened us with still more colonies.

“but all danger has not been averted, and we are threatened with an eighty years’ warfare in morocco. is there never to be an end to the colonial mania?

“i am fully aware that nations are not sensible. how can it be expected of them, if one considers what they are made of? still, a certain instinct oftentimes warns them of what is harmful. they are occasionally endowed with the power of observing. in the long run they undergo the painful experience of their errors and blunders. the day will come when it will dawn upon them that colonies are a source of perils and ruinous results. commercial barbarism will be followed by commercial civilisation, and forcible, by pacific penetration. these ideas have to-day found an echo even in the bosom of parliaments. they will prevail, not because men will be more disinterested, but because they will know their own interests better.

“the great human asset is man himself. in order to rate the terrestrial globe, it is necessary to begin by rating men. to exploit the soil, the mines, the waters, all the substances and all the forces of our planet, it needs man, the whole of man; humanity, the whole of humanity. the complete exploitation of the terrestrial globe demands the united labour of white, yellow, and black men. by reducing, diminishing, and weakening, or, to sum it up in one word, by colonising a portion of humanity, we are working against ourselves. it is to our advantage that yellow and black men should be powerful, free, and wealthy. our prosperity and our wealth depend on theirs. the more is produced, the more will there be consumed. the greater the profit they derive from us, the greater the profit we shall derive from them. if they reap the benefit of our labours, so shall we fully reap theirs.

“if we study the movements which govern the destinies of societies, we may perhaps discover signs that the era of violent deeds is coming to an end. war, which was formerly a standing institution among nations, is now intermittent, and the periods of peace have become of longer duration than those of war. our country affords the observations of a fact full of interest, for the french nation presents an original characteristic in the military history of nations. whereas other nations never waged war except from interest or necessity, alone the french have fought for the pleasure of fighting. now it is remarkable that the taste of our compatriots has undergone a change. thirty years ago renan wrote: ‘whoever knows france as a whole and in her provincial varieties will not hesitate to recognise the fact that the movement swaying this country for the past fifty years is essentially pacific.’ it is a fact attested by a large number of observers that in 1870 france had no desire to have recourse to the arbitrament of war, and that the declaration of war was greeted with consternation. it is an assured fact that few frenchmen dream of taking the field, and that everybody readily accepts the idea that the army exists in order to avoid a war. let me quote one example out of a thousand in confirmation of this state of mind. monsieur ribot, a representative of the people and a former cabinet minister, having been invited to some patriotic celebration, replied with an eloquent letter, begging to be excused. the same monsieur ribot knits his brows superciliously at the mere mention of the word disarmament. he has towards standards and cannon the leaning proper to a former minister of foreign affairs. in his letter he denounces as a national peril the pacific ideas disseminated by the socialist. he sees in them a spirit of renunciation he cannot endure. not that he is of a bellicose turn of mind. he, too, sighs for peace, but a peace full of pomp, magnificent, and flashing with the same pride as war. between monsieur ribot and jaurès, the matter is merely one of form. both of them are for peace. jaurès, simply; monsieur ribot, superbly. that is all. better still and more surely than the socialist democracy which contents itself with a bloused or coated peace does the sentiment of the bourgeois, who demand a peace gleaming with military insignia and bedecked with emblems of glory, testify to the inevitable decline of all idea of revenge and conquests, since one discerns in it the military instinct, at the very time when it is losing its nature and is becoming pacific.

“france is acquiring by degrees the sentiment of her true strength, consisting in intellectual strength; she is becoming conscious of her mission, which is the sowing of ideas and the exercise of a sway over thought. she will within measurable time perceive that her only stable power has lain in her speakers, her writers, and her men of science. hence she will some day fain have to recognise that the force of numbers, after having so often betrayed her, is finally escaping from her, and that the time has come for her to resign herself to the glory which the exercise of the mind and the use of reason assure her of.”

jean boilly, shaking his head, said:

“you ask that france should teach other nations concord and peace. are you so sure that she will be listened to and her example followed? is her own tranquillity so assured? has she not to fear threats from outside, to foresee dangers, to watch over her safety, and to provide for her defence? one swallow does not make a summer; one nation does not make the peace of the world. is it so sure that germany keeps up an army with the sole object of not waging war? her social-democrats desire peace. but they are not the masters, and their deputies do not enjoy in the parliament the authority which the number of their electors should give them. and russia, who has hardly entered upon the industrial period, do you believe that she will soon be entering upon the pacific period? is it not to be feared that after having disturbed asia she will disturb europe?

“supposing even that europe should become pacific, can you not see that america would become warlike? following upon cuba, reduced to the state of a vassal republic, hawaii, porto rico, and the annexation of the philippines, it is impossible to say that the american union is not a conquering nation. a publicist of yankee proclivities, stead, has said amid the plaudits of the whole of the united states: ‘the americanisation of the world is on the march.’ and then there is mr. roosevelt, whose dream is to plant the stars and stripes in south africa, australia, and the west indies. mr. roosevelt is imperialist and he sighs for an america mistress of the world. between ourselves, he is planning the empire of augustus. he has unfortunately perused livy. the conquests of the romans banish sleep from him. have you read his speeches? they breathe a bellicose spirit. ‘fight, my friends,’ says mr. roosevelt, ‘and fight hard. there is nothing like blows. we are upon earth only to exterminate one another. those who tell you the contrary are men without morality. mistrust men who think. thought enervates. ’tis a french failing. the romans conquered the world. they lost it. we are the modern romans.’ words full of eloquence, backed up with a navy which will soon be the second in the world, and with a military budget of 40,500,000 francs!

“the yankees declare that in four years’ time they will fight germany. if we are to believe this, they should first tell us where they expect to come into contact with the enemy. that a russia, the serf of her czar, that a still feudal germany, should entertain armies for fighting purposes, this one is tempted to lay to the door of ancient habits and the survival of a strenuous past. but that a young democracy, the united states of america, an aggregation of business men, a mass of emigrants from all countries, lacking community, traditions, and memories, madly cast into the scramble for the mighty dollar, should of a sudden be swept with the desire of firing torpedoes at the flanks of battleships, and of exploding mines under the enemy’s columns, affords a proof that the inordinate struggle for the production and exploitation of riches keeps alive the employment of and taste for brutal force, that industrial violence engenders military violence, and that mercantile rivalries kindle between nations hatreds that bloodshed can alone extinguish. the colonial mania of which you were speaking a while ago is but one of the thousand forms of the much-vaunted competition of our economists. the capitalistic state is just as much a warlike one as the feudal. the era has dawned of great wars for the industrial sovereignty. under the present régime of national production it is the cannon which fixes tariffs, establishes customs, opens and closes markets. there exists no other regulator of commerce and industry. extermination is the fatal result of the economic conditions in which the civilised world finds itself to-day....”

the perfume of gorgonzola and stracchino was pervading the table. the waiter was bringing in wax-candles to each of which was attached the abbrustolatoio[h] wherewith to light the long cigars with straws, so dear to italians.

[h] abbrustolatoio—apparatus attached to the candle; it has two rings through which the cigar is placed, and left to burn awhile.

hippolyte dufresne, who for some time past seemed to have remained indifferent to the conversation, here remarked in a low tone tinged with an ostentatious modesty:

“gentlemen, our friend langelier was asserting just now that many men are afraid of disgracing themselves in the eyes of their contemporaries by assuming the horrible immorality which is to be the morality of the future. i do not entertain a like fear, and i have written a little tale, which has perhaps no other merit than the one of revealing my calmness of mind when considering the future. i shall one day crave permission to read it to you.”

“read it right away,” said boni, lighting his cigar.

“you will be giving us pleasure,” added joséphin leclerc, nicole langelier, and m. goubin.

“i am not sure whether i have the manuscript with me,” replied hippolyte dufresne.

with these words, he drew out of his pocket a roll of paper, and began to read what follows.