i shall take occasion hereafter to show under what form the preponderating taste of a democratic people for very general ideas manifests itself in politics; but i would point out, at the present stage of my work, its principal effect on philosophy. it cannot be denied that pantheism has made great progress in our age. the writings of a part of europe bear visible marks of it: the germans introduce it into philosophy, and the french into literature. most of the works of imagination published in france contain some opinions or some tinge caught from pantheistical doctrines, or they disclose some tendency to such doctrines in their authors. this appears to me not only to proceed from an accidental, but from a permanent cause.

when the conditions of society are becoming more equal, and each individual man becomes more like all the rest, more weak and more insignificant, a habit grows up of ceasing to notice the citizens to consider only the people, and of overlooking individuals to think only of their kind. at such times the human mind seeks to embrace a multitude of different objects at once; and it constantly strives to succeed in connecting a variety of consequences with a single cause. the idea of unity so possesses itself of man, and is sought for by him so universally, that if he thinks he has found it, he readily yields himself up to repose in that belief. nor does he content himself with the discovery that nothing is in the world but a creation and a creator; still embarrassed by this primary division of things, he seeks to expand and to simplify his conception by including god and the universe in one great whole. if there be a philosophical system which teaches that all things material and immaterial, visible and invisible, which the world contains, are only to be considered as the several parts of an immense being, which alone remains unchanged amidst the continual change and ceaseless transformation of all that constitutes it, we may readily infer that such a system, although it destroy the individuality of man—nay, rather because it destroys that individuality—will have secret charms for men living in democracies. all their habits of thought prepare them to conceive it, and predispose them to adopt it. it naturally attracts and fixes their imagination; it fosters the pride, whilst it soothes the indolence, of their minds. amongst the different systems by whose aid philosophy endeavors to explain the universe, i believe pantheism to be one of those most fitted to seduce the human mind in democratic ages. against it all who abide in their attachment to the true greatness of man should struggle and combine.