it has long been recognized that ideas rule the world, and that power is the translation of ideas into material force, but the real nature of world forces and the elementary laws of their operation have been obscured by superstition and prejudice, and little attempt has been made to recognize their true significance.

the great world war has indeed emphasized the immense power of ideas. we hear much of propaganda and ideals. in medicine we hear more of "psychotherapy," or the treatment of disease by persuasive and hypnotic methods. we are aware, too, that our merchants have long known the practical and tangible value of advertisement, that is, the insistent repetition of a coloured statement until it is believed to be true, and that our priests, teachers and politicians have for centuries relied on this method alone. but for the most part these people have little real knowledge or understanding of the power they are using, and of which they are themselves the mere puppets. a supreme illustration is the real impotence of the various belligerent governments[pg 45] to direct or cope with the immeasurable psychic forces now pursuing their cataclysmic course, and their inability to foretell the direction in which they are leading a bewildered world. nowhere is this more graphically apparent than in russia, whose kaleidoscopic upheavals have baffled all prophets.

i do not suggest that the causal origin of the european war is purely psychic in character, it may with greater certainty be found years before its disastrous developments, in the steadily increasing pressure of population, assisted by the gradual elimination of the natural checks[41] among the indigent and unfit[42] and the proportionate increase in the burdens of the fit, due chiefly to the growth of democratic ideas and trend of religious influences; this pressure found expression in policies of expansion among the more prolific nations, and in the case of germany, where relief could not adequately be found in colonization, as a natural consequence engendered assiduous military and bellicose propaganda, which was bound eventually to culminate in a world war.

in order to facilitate a brief analysis of mob-psychology and public opinion, and to examine their rightful place in the science of [pg 46]psychodynamics and their relation to the hypnotic "law of suggestion," i have introduced the term cosmic suggestion. there are few thinkers who would attempt to deny that the same factors, processes and influences are observable in the formation of all classes of opinion, whether they are called religious, moral, political or artistic. it is, unfortunately, equally evident that reason, except in the case of scientific opinion, usually plays the smaller and emotion and desire the greater part in their formation. we say that this is unfortunate because emotion never brings us nearer the truth. poets and ecstatic visionaries have sung the praises of emotion because to them emotion alone was real and the normal medium of truth. on the other hand the investigator is bound to arrive at a different conclusion. "emotion" has nothing whatever to do with the attainment of truth. that which we prize under the name of "emotion" is an elaborate activity of the brain, which consists of feelings of like and dislike, motions of assent and dissent, impulses of desire and aversion. it may be influenced by the most diverse activities of the organism, by the cravings of the senses and the muscles, the stomach, the sexual organs, etc. the interests of truth are far from promoted by these conditions and vacillations of emotion; on the contrary, such circumstances often disturb that reason which alone is adapted to the pursuit of truth, and frequently mar its perceptive power. "no cosmic problem is solved, or even[pg 47] advanced, by the cerebral function we call emotion."[43]

from the earliest times shrewd observers have commented on the ease with which the passions of men are inflamed and united, often by the least worthy of objects. dr. samuel johnson, describing the progress of an agitator bidding for adherence, tersely remarks, "ale and clamour unite their powers, the crowd, condensed and heated, begins to ferment with the leaven of sedition."[44]

before proceeding further, it may be well to make a brief examination of the hypothesis most in accord with the results of recent psychological research and ascertainable fact.

it has gradually come to be recognized in scientific circles that recent advances in psychology have made it impossible to pursue that science any longer entirely on a physiological, anatomical and histological basis. it is now also hardly likely to be disputed that not only is consciousness not the sum total of man's psychic activities but that the greater part of them are subconscious or unconscious. thus, according to professor james ward, "our threshold of consciousness must be compared to the surface of a lake, and subconsciousness to the depths beneath it, and all the current terminology of presentations rising and sinking implies this or some similar figure."

[pg 48]

another writer in a recent publication makes use of an analogous illustration by describing human personality as an iceberg, the great bulk of which is always invisible and submerged.[45]

the matter is further complicated by the fact that within the domain of the subconscious there exists a vitality which cannot be traced to a cerebral or somatic source. stated in broad terms it may be said that mind, or the sum total of personality, must be viewed in two interactionary aspects: the primary consciousness and secondary consciousness, or the conscious and the subconscious or subliminal or (in a special sense) subjective, according to the various terms used by different writers to express the same thing.

for the purpose of greater lucidity, it has usually been found that this dual aspect of mind can be best expressed by treating the whole mental organization as consisting of two minds, each endowed with separate and distinct attributes and powers; each capable, under certain conditions, of independent action. it may be that a truer idea would be conveyed if the mind-whole was described as possessing certain attributes and powers under some conditions, and certain other attributes and powers under other conditions. as my object, here, is to enter no further into psychological questions than is necessary for the elucidation of those ethical[pg 49] considerations which are dependent upon them, i shall give a short account of those theories which, in the light of present knowledge, appear best founded and afford most assistance in connexion with the subject of morality.

thomas j. hudson, whose hypothesis i shall make use of to illustrate my meaning, assumed for practical purposes that man has two minds. in making use to some extent of hudson's theory, i do so not because it is necessarily correct, for his hypothesis was, admittedly, to a certain extent provisional; but because it was the first practical working hypothesis on which all psychic and hypnotic phenomena could be based, and because it has largely been used as a basis for subsequent elaborations.

in 1892, hudson, in his "law of psychic phenomena," said: "in more recent years the doctrine of duality of mind is beginning to be more clearly defined, and it may now be said to constitute a cardinal principle in the philosophy of many of the ablest exponents of the new psychology." to-day when psychotherapeutics have claimed the attention of students of pathology, and when at last the medical profession has almost throughout enlisted the co-operation and help of hypnotism, there are far fewer people who would deny the existence of that substratum of consciousness, distinct from the manifestation of the normal waking mind, which is so profitably studied in the phenomena of somnambulism, hypnotism and lunacy.

[pg 50]

the briefest statement of the salient features of hudson's hypothesis will suffice to enable me to suggest the irresistible conclusion that the prime factor in the formation of all opinion, collective and individual, the chief determinant of conduct, and the greatest motive force in the world, is analogous and co-relative to hypnotic suggestion.

hudson was the first to attempt a clear definition of the r?le and nature of the two elements which constitute the dual mind. for the sake of greater clearness he speaks of these two aspects of mind as though they were two minds, possessing distinctive characteristics and a line of demarcation between the two, clearly defined. to continue in his own words: "their functions are essentially unlike; each is endowed with separate and distinct attributes and powers; and each is capable, under certain conditions and limitations, of independent action." the author then distinguishes the two by designating the one objective and the other subjective. it is unfortunate that he makes use of a nomenclature in which these terms are slightly perverted from their legitimate meaning, or perhaps, as he expresses it, modified and extended, but since he prefers to use them rather than attempt to coin new ones, it will be necessary to employ them with reference to his law; in every case in which these designations are employed in conjunction with the word mind, or printed in italics, they will be used in this sense.

[pg 51]

they are defined thus: "the objective mind takes cognizance of the objective world. its media of observation are the five physical senses. it is the outgrowth of man's physical necessities.... its highest function is that of reasoning."[46] in other words, the objective mind functionates from the brain and is susceptible of anatomical localization, whilst "the subjective mind takes cognizance of its environment by means independent of the physical senses. it perceives by intuition.... it performs its highest functions when the objective senses are in obeyance. in a word, it is that intelligence which makes itself manifest in a hypnotic subject when he is in a state of somnambulism."[47]

whether we call it soul or subjective mind matters not; what matters is the fact that in all psychic phenomena there is sufficient evidence to show that the two aspects of mind interact according to certain observable principles. the main principle affecting man's mental organization on which hudson builds his hypothesis is the law of suggestion, first discovered by liébeault, the founder of the nancy school of hypnotism, during his researches in 1866. it is this: that hypnotic subjects are constantly amenable to the power of suggestion. this proposition may be said to have been demonstrated as true beyond all possibility of doubt.

starting with this discovery, hudson, after[pg 52] defining the dual character of mind, introduces two propositions, namely: that the subjective mind is constantly amenable to control by suggestion, and that the subjective mind is incapable of inductive reasoning. man in hypnotic state has invariably given sufficient evidence to show that the subjective mind accepts, without hesitation or doubt, every statement that is made to it.

with regard to this law of suggestion it is well to remember that, while the subjective mind is invariably and constantly swayed by suggestion, and is capable of offering no resistance except that which has been communicated to it by the objective mind, or which is inherent in its nature, the objective mind, on the other hand, is perpetually assailed by extrinsic suggestion, its capacity for resistance being in proportion to the dominant quality and development of the mind-whole.

the objective mind, it will therefore be seen, is potentially selective, that is to say, the measure of its quality is its capacity to select at will intellectual nourishment from the whole range of humanity and nature, free from the oppression of its psychic environment. the rare combination of this intellectual fastidiousness with a super-sensibility is the mark of true genius.

every one is conscious that at times we become aware of impulses, inclinations and concepts which seem to form no part of our thinking or waking minds; they seem to come from the[pg 53] depths of our souls in response to some vital need of our existence. when the tendency appears to be hereditary we call these promptings instincts[48] and consider it right to suppress them or hold them in check. we do not resign ourselves wholesale to unbridled licentiousness or anger because the reproductive instinct and pugnacity are inherent in our nature; on the contrary, we realize that our best interests lie in self-control. if, on the other hand, the impulse is less easily accounted for, if, maybe, the message of our souls runs counter to our normal instincts, our interests or reason, we are apt to assume that the impulse emanates from outside our nature and must have, many of us think, a supernatural or divine origin.

it may be said then that most people distinguish "good" and "bad" impulses, or impulses which must be inhibited and impulses which should be followed at all costs.

theology, as taught in the sunday school, treats the subject somewhat after this fashion: "all mortals are assailed by the powers of good and evil; the vehicle of the divine will is 'conscience,' the voice of conscience is the voice of god within us. beware of the world, the flesh and the devil; the devil calls to his[pg 54] victims in the guise of the flesh." this idea is exploited for all it is worth in conjunction with the doctrine of original sin: the stock device of priestcraft to enhance the value of its own ministrations and sacraments. the spiritual teacher will usually "bring the lesson home" by a vivid description of the habits and idiosyncrasies of a mephistophelian devil with a particular liability to appropriate the "laws of our lower nature" for the sole purpose of baulking his equally anthropomorphic antagonist, the god of jews and christians, whose voice may be recognized in the pangs of remorse and self-debasement. a child subjected to this form of instruction during the most impressionable period of its existence is usually left for the remainder of its life with a vague distrust of nature, a proportionate reverence for the super-natural, and an impression that asceticism is the highest attainable virtue, together with a totally false appreciation of mental phenomena and the real value of self-control.

every man should learn to know himself and seek the origin of his impulses. history is full of examples of men and women who believed themselves attended by guardian angels or familiar spirits who prompted their actions and gave them advice; socrates was constantly attended by his daimones, and joan of arc used to hear "spirit voices." these and similar cases were evidence of the predominance of the subjective over the objective mind. in a normally balanced[pg 55] mind the objective is in control; in the reverse process the objective mind is dormant and the subjective dominates the throne of reason. this is the case in dreams, trance, hypnosis and cerebral diseases. it is also the case, in greater or lesser degree, whenever the brain is stunned or is said to be "unbalanced" as the result of great emotional excitement or shock. it is then that impulse and instinct take the place of, or inhibit, rational thought. impulses emanate from the subjective mind, and may result from the inherent nature and real character of the individual; or they may reflect the autosuggestions of the individual, or his bodily desires (this may be termed reflex-suggestion), or the suggestions of others; or, again, the latter, acting upon the subjective mind, may awaken related tendencies or inclinations and result in new complex impulses. extreme cases of subjective control result in madness; the false premises conveyed by the disordered cerebral organs must result in deductions by the subjective mind of equal abnormality. control by the subjective mind nearly always produces in the subject either a feeling of dual personality, in which two egos are realized, each distinct from the other—the old me and the new me—or else the subjective mind is identified with a totally distinct, extrinsic and usually superior individual; delusions of dual personality or demoniacal control are among the first recognized symptoms of cerebral disease. the greatest and maddest[pg 56] fanatics in history have usually attributed their powers to spirit control. poets and artists have sometimes confessed that their most brilliant work was produced under conditions akin to trance; in some cases—coleridge and edgar allan poe are well-known examples—the state was artificially induced. many have felt as though they were possessed by a mightier spirit than their own, which dictated while they merely obeyed.

professor william james, after describing delusions of dual, alternating and superimposed personality, which are common symptoms of insanity, continues: "the literature of insanity is filled with narratives of such illusions as these.... one patient has another self that repeats all his thoughts for him. others, among whom are some of the first characters in history, have familiar demons who speak with them, and are replied to. in another, some one 'makes' his thoughts for him. another has two bodies, lying in different beds. or the cries of the patient himself are assigned to another person with whom the patient expresses sympathy."[49]

if macaulay is right in the following passage, "subjective control" would appear to be the essential condition for the production of poetry: "perhaps no man can be a poet, or can even enjoy poetry, without a certain unsoundness of mind—if anything which gives so much pleasure ought to be called unsoundness.... truth, indeed, is essential to poetry, but it is the truth[pg 57] of madness. the reasonings are just, but the premises are false."[50]

another often quoted passage, from c?sar lombroso's "man of genius," bears out the same thing: "many men of genius who have studied themselves, and who have spoken of their inspiration, have described it as a sweet and seductive fever, during which their thought had become rapidly and involuntarily fruitful, and has burst forth like the flame of a lighted torch." "kuh's most beautiful poems," wrote bauer, "were dictated in a state between sanity and reason; at the moment when his sublime thoughts came to him he was incapable of simple reasoning."

not the least remarkable of the powers of the subjective mind is its apparently absolute memory; not only are those experiences of which we have objective cognizance indelibly recorded, but innumerable occurrences in our environment, which pass unnoticed or of which we are even consciously unaware, seem to be registered by the subjective mind. although it cannot be included in the term memory, implying conscious memory, we have good reason for believing that in common with all living organisms the subjective mind of men records not only the result of its own experience, but also is impregnated by those experiences of its ancestors which have been transformed into habits and have become innate, and that by this means only progress[pg 58] and evolution are capable of explanation. this unconscious register of ancestral experience, about which we shall have more to say in another chapter, is here adduced as being an additional factor which must have considerable bearing on the nature of subjective impulses. the theories of unconscious and of "organic" memories[51] throw a great deal of light on the transmission of hereditary characters and of instincts. the very fact of the appearance of hereditary characteristics in, for example, young ducks hatched out by a hen, who persist in showing their ancestry by making for the first pond they see in spite of the astonished remonstrances of their foster-mother, points to race memory as the only solution.

telepathy is again another factor in connexion with the subjective mind which must be taken into account. it has been described as the normal means of communication between subjective minds en rapport; the possibilities of its influence cannot be ignored. is it surprising, when we realize the range, scope and complexity of the subconscious intelligence within ourselves, that its emanations are sometimes mistaken for messages from another world?

this brief reference to some of the more[pg 59] noticeable influences which affect the inherent character of the subjective mind may help to indicate the importance of the law of suggestion with regard to the theory of conscience (literally self-knowledge—but in practice more often lack of self-knowledge). this law can be most profitably studied in the phenomena of hypnotism, for the reason that "the objective mind, or let us say man in his normal condition, is not controllable, against reason, positive knowledge, or the evidence of his senses, by the suggestions of another." (we have discussed his potential capacity for resistance.) "the subjective mind, or man in the hypnotic state," on the other hand, "is unqualifiedly and constantly amenable to the power of suggestion."[52] in this condition the subjective mind accepts unhesitatingly every statement that is made to it, no matter how absurd or incongruous or contrary to the objective experience of the individual. if the subject is told that he is a dog, he will instantly accept the suggestion, and to the limit of physical possibility act the part suggested. if he is told he is napoleon, he will again act the part with wonderful fidelity to life. the suggestion of pursuing devils will send him into a lively terror. he will become intoxicated by drinking a glass of water under the impression that it is brandy. if told he is suffering from a high fever, his pulse will become rapid, his face flushed and his temperature will rise. "in short, he can be[pg 60] made to see, smell, hear, or feel anything in obedience to suggestion." these are fundamental facts known not only to students of hypnotism but also very extensively to the general public.

equal and complementary to the law of suggestion is the law of autosuggestion. having accepted for purposes of clarity hudson's view of the independent powers and functions of the two aspects of mind, it naturally follows that the subjective mind of an individual is as amenable to the control of his own objective mind as to the objective mind of another; in fact we have sufficient reason to know that it is more so. for instance, it is well known that a normal person cannot be hypnotized against his will, for the contrary autosuggestion of the subject negatives the suggestion of the operator. even after a subject has consented to be hypnotized the settled habits of his life are sufficiently strong autosuggestions to defend him against the violation of his most tenacious principles. if, for instance, a hypnotic subject is conscientiously opposed to the use of alcohol, he cannot be persuaded to drink water under the impression that it is whisky. this fact is of the greatest importance in relation to criminology.

in this connexion the following passage from moll's "hypnotism" is of interest: "the more an action is repulsive to the disposition [of an individual], the stronger is his resistance. habit and education play a large part here; it is[pg 61] generally very difficult to suggest anything opposed to the confirmed habits of the subject.

"for instance, suggestions are made with success to a devout catholic, but directly the suggestion conflicts with his creed it will not be accepted. the surroundings play a part also. a subject will frequently decline a suggestion that will make him appear ridiculous. a woman whom i easily put into cateleptic postures, and who made suggested movements, could not be persuaded to put out her tongue at the spectators.

"it is interesting to observe the way in which resistance is expressed, both in hypnotic and post-hypnotic suggestion. i, myself, have observed the interesting phenomenon that subjects have asked to be awakened when a suggestion displeased them."[53]

it is a fundamental law of hypnotism that it cannot be used as an agent for the commission of a crime, that is, unless the subject is criminally disposed. it is obvious that the same rule applies to sexual crimes; hudson lays it down as an unassailable fact that no virtuous woman ever was, or ever can be, successfully assaulted while in a hypnotic condition.

it will now be realized that autosuggestion embraces not only the assertions of the objective mind of an individual, addressed to his own subjective mind, but also his habits of thought and the settled principles and convictions of his whole life. the more intense these principles[pg 62] and convictions are, the stronger the autosuggestion will be, and relatively harder to be overcome by the contrary suggestions of another. it is a law of universal applicability that the strongest suggestion must prevail.

so far we have alluded only to suggestion applied during hypnosis; it should be remembered, however, that it is now a settled principle of psychotherapeutics that suggestion also operates, and from a therapeutic point of view is sometimes more efficacious, in the normal waking or sleeping condition; though in the latter case, without complete amenability, the results are seldom so striking. the condition in normal waking life which produces phenomena most closely resembling those of hypnosis is that of strong emotional excitement. we find, also, that in normal life suggestions of the greatest potency and having the most far-reaching effects are conveyed by means of emotional states. although a close resemblance exists between the result of suggestion in hypnosis and the result of suggestion in normal and emotion states, similarity of result does not, as dr. bramwell points out in this connexion, necessarily imply identity of cause. in fact there are some important differences between the two conditions which produce the phenomena, as well as some distinctions between the phenomena themselves: whereas fear, hope, faith, religious excitement and kindred emotions are almost invariably present in cases which are cited as analogous to hypnotic ones, some of[pg 63] these, such as fear and other violent emotions, effectually preclude the production of hypnosis, and further, subjects who are most amenable to emotional suggestions are often those whom it is most difficult to hypnotize.[54]

the principle of psychotherapeutics depends, as is well known, upon the close dependence of the organs and normal bodily functions upon the behests of the mind. hudson expresses this in the form of a proposition, namely: "the subjective mind has absolute control of the functions, conditions and sensations of the body." although this statement contains a very important principle we should not allow it to obscure the fact of the reverse process. as james, bain and others have shown, antecedent bodily conditions often react directly upon the mind. the general truth, however, of the proposition may be readily perceived when we remember that perfect an?sthesia can be produced at the will of the operator by suggestion. the effect of mental stimuli upon functional conditions is also commonly observed under normal conditions in such phenomena as blushing, turning pale, the quickening of the pulse, fainting, etc., all of which should be sufficient to convince any one who gives the subject a moment's consideration of the very direct and instant way the mind affects the body.

several typical examples of the influence of autosuggestion, or imagination, over intestinal action during sleep are quoted by bernheim from[pg 64] the "bibliothèque choisie de médecine." they consist for the most part of recorded cases where, for instance, the subjects, having registered an intention to use a purgative the following day, have dreamt during the night with particular vividness that the dose had already been taken, with the result that, influenced by the imaginary aperient, they had awakened to yield to nature's demands, with the same result as if the dose had already been taken.

it may not be out of place to refer to another example from my personal experience of the potency of suggestion in affecting functional disturbances during sleep. during my first week at a public school, the dampness of the new climate brought on a bad attack of bronchial asthma, which i had not been troubled with for some time previously. the first bad attack occurred at night, when some noise had caused me to wake up. when i had recovered sufficiently to look at the time, i noticed it was 2 a.m. and at the same time heard the school clock faintly striking that hour. fearing and half expecting another attack the next night; i asked that asthma powder and the usual remedies might be made available in case they were needed. that night, as i had feared, and for the next ten nights in succession, i woke struggling for breath, precisely on the first stroke of the school clock striking two, and experienced the worst attacks i ever had. they were undoubtedly induced at that exact time by the autosuggestion which[pg 65] connected the symptom with the hour and by the conviction or fear, after the first experience, that the attack would recur at the same hour.

as we have already shown, one of the chief factors in autosuggestion is faith. this is, in fact, a fundamental principle recognized by all faith-healers from jesus of nazareth onwards.

the cases during the present war where nervous aphonia and paralysis, popularly diagnosed with co-related cases of neurasthenia under the comprehensive title "shell shock," have completely yielded to simple suggestion by affirmation on the part of the physician and confidence on the part of the patient, must number hundreds of recorded cases. excellent results are often obtained in cases of aphonia and paralysis by the suggestive influence of electricity applied to the vocal cords and the nerve centres. bernheim[55] records several cures of this description. smith and pear[56] quote a striking but somewhat erratic case in which suggestion was conveyed purely by the faradic current. the case is recorded by bl?sig[57] of a sailor on the german battle cruiser derfflinger. "a seaman from the derfflinger was brought into a naval hospital with loss of voice on december 22, 1914, and could only speak in a whisper. he stated that his voice had always been clear and well under control. at the beginning of december he had a slight cold, which[pg 66] he attributed to sentry duty on deck in very stormy and wet weather. while in the ammunition chamber of the big guns, he was greatly upset during the firing and suddenly lost his voice. after fourteen days he recovered his speech. on february 12, 1915, he returned to hospital with complete loss of voice, immediately after the naval engagement in the north sea. on february 15 he was treated with electricity, directly applied to the vocal cords, and on march 20 he was discharged with complete recovery of his speech. but on returning to duty, as soon as he went on board his ship, his voice was suddenly lost for the third time and he remained aphonic."

more spectacular, but not more wonderful than the cures of the professional psychiatrist, are some of the so-called miracles that fill the pages of religious history; and they are less easy to explain, according to the invariable laws of suggestion, only in proportion to their lack of authenticity. there is no reason for doubting that thousands of remarkable and absolutely authenticated cures have taken place at the healing waters of lourdes, or that many of the recorded cases of the cure of epileptics, blind, deaf and dumb and sick at the hands of saints and others are substantially true. many of these stories are, of course, embellished and exaggerated, while others are wholly fictitious, but the majority are based upon more than a foundation of fact. the one essential in all these cases is faith[pg 67] in healer and patient. the truth of the hypothesis upon which that faith is founded has not the slightest effect on the efficacy of the cure. hudson quotes the following passage from bernheim: "among all the moral causes which, appealing to the imagination, set the cerebral mechanism of possible causes at work, none is so efficacious as religious faith. numbers of authentic cures have certainly been due to it." on this fact are based the numerous theories propounded by the different sects and schools of faith- and prayer-healers that exist to-day.

the conclusion is irresistible and obvious to any one not blinded by religious prejudice that whether the object of faith is real or false the result attained will be the same in either case. faith will produce "miracles" irrespective of the premises on which it is founded. this accounts for the quite considerable success (apart from financial considerations) attained by "christian scientists" in spite of the self-evident absurdity of their tenets, and the fact that they are without the remotest conception of the real principles which underlie their so-called "science."

one of the most important and striking facts discovered by students of hypnotism is the complete recollection by the subject in the hypnotic condition of all he may have learned or forgotten in the normal state, and, in fact, of all he may consciously or unconsciously have experienced, and this recollection can be induced[pg 68] at the will of the operator. the subjective mind is said to have a perfect memory, that is to say, it is capable of registering with unfailing accuracy every experience of the individual; for this reason hypnotic subjects have a range and wealth of knowledge quite beyond their waking abilities. it is self-evident that any forgotten fact that is recalled by an effort or at random, when an associationist explanation would be wholly inadequate, must have lain stored all the while below the level of consciousness.

as the factors of memory and heredity together have an important bearing on the growth of moral ideas, we may deal with the subject a little more fully. according to james, "the stream of thought flows on: but most of its segments fall into the bottomless abyss of oblivion."[58] "retention means liability [the italics are the author's] to recall, and it means nothing more than such liability. the only proof of there being retention is that recall actually takes place."[59] his position is slightly modified some pages later, where he says, after recording a few cases of hypnotic memory: "all these pathological facts are showing us that the sphere of possible recollection may be wider than we think, and that in certain matters apparently oblivion is no proof against possible recall under other conditions." but adds: "they give no countenance, however, to the extravagant opinion that nothing we experience[pg 69] can be absolutely forgotten."[60] the only reason he gives, however, for discountenancing this possibility is that he cannot find sufficient explanation for it. on the other hand, we believe that there is now ample evidence to show that all experience is retained in some portion of the psychic whole, and that although it may not have been consciously realized at all, it will still have been subconsciously registered. one of the cases most often quoted in illustration of this appears in coleridge's "biographia literaria"[61] and is here repeated since it is given by james and also at greater length by hudson.[62] according to the author it occurred a year or two before his arrival at g?ttingen.

"in a roman catholic town in germany, a young woman, who could neither read nor write, was seized with a fever, and was said by the priests to be possessed of a devil, because she was heard talking latin, greek and hebrew. whole sheets of her ravings were written out and found to consist of sentences intelligible in themselves but having slight connexion with each other. of her hebrew sayings, only a few could be traced to the bible and most seemed to be in the rabbinical dialect. many eminent physiologists and psychologists visited the town and [pg 70]cross-examined the case on the spot. all trick was out of the question; the woman was a simple creature: there was no doubt as to the fever. it was long before any explanation, save that of demoniacal possession, could be obtained. at last the mystery was unveiled by a physician, who determined to trace back the girl's history, and who, after much trouble, discovered that at the age of nine she had been charitably taken by an old protestant pastor, a great hebrew scholar, in whose house she lived till his death. on further inquiry, it appeared to have been the old man's custom for years to walk up and down a passage of his house into which the kitchen opened, and to read to himself with a loud voice out of his books. the books were ransacked, and among them were found several greek and latin fathers, together with a collection of rabbinical writings. in these works so many of the passages taken down at the young woman's bedside were identical that there could be no reasonable doubt as to their source."

james, who considered that phenomenal memories were accounted for by the exceptional persistence or permanence of the "paths" of thought, a purely physiological property of the brain-tissue of the individual, quotes a case within his own experience which, if we accept hudson's theory, affords a typical illustration of the facility possessed by some men of drawing upon the knowledge of their own subjective minds.

"what these cases show is that the mere[pg 71] organic retentiveness of a man need bear no definite relation to his other mental powers. men of the highest general powers will often forget nothing, however insignificant. one of the most generally accomplished men i know has a memory of this sort. he never keeps written note of anything, yet is never at a loss for a fact which he has once heard. as an instance of his desultory memory, he was introduced to a certain colonel at a club. the conversation fell upon the signs of age in man. the colonel challenged him to estimate his age. he looked at him, and gave the exact day of his birth, to the wonder of all. but the secret of this accuracy was that, having picked up some days previously an army register, he had idly turned over its list of names with the dates of birth, graduation, promotion, etc., attached, and when the colonel's name was mentioned to him at the club, these figures, on which he had not bestowed a moment's thought, involuntarily surged up in his mind."

it is hoped that the foregoing has made it clear that a distinction exists between the normal or objective memory, or recollection, which is capable of cerebral localization, and the subjective memory, which appears to be absolute and without anatomical basis. the very fact that the normal memory is most efficient when the brain is healthy, and the remarkable powers of the subjective memory are seen to the best advantage when the brain is diseased or dormant, serves to emphasize the distinction. this, too, explains[pg 72] the otherwise unaccountable fact that quite abnormal memories are sometimes possessed by imbeciles equally with men of genius, especially that type of ecstatic mind often mistaken for genius by the world. mr. bernard shaw, laying great emphasis on the distinction, proclaims the domination of will, not reason, as the mark of genius in art.[63] but the distinction is superfluous and misleading: it is just that type of "genius" (?), fruitful when the will is an?sthetized and the range and wealth of the subjective mind given free play, whose works degenerate into decadent mysticism; it is when reason ceases to direct the course of genius that the subjective stratum dominates the throne; and the mind, fed and nourished by the deep-seated lusts of the body, grows mad with the exuberance of its own descriptive powers.