a peasant summoned a sheep into courts charging the poor thing with a criminal offence. the judge was—the fox.

the case was immediately in full swing. plaintiff and defendant were equally adjured to state, point by point, and without both speaking at once, how the affair took place, and in what their proof consisted.

says the peasant: "on such and such a day, i missed two of my fowls early in the morning. nothing was left of them but bones and leathers; and no one had been in the yard but the sheep."

then the sheep depones that it was fast asleep all the night in question, and it calls all its neighbours to testify that they had never known it guilty either of theft or any roguery; and besides this, it states that it never touches flesh-meat.

here is the fox's decision, word for word:

"the explanation of the sheep cannot, under any circumstances, be accepted, for all rogues are notoriously clever at concealing their real designs; and it appears manifest, on due inquiry, that, on the aforesaid night, the sheep was not separated from the fowls. fowls are exceedingly savoury, and opportunity favoured. therefore i decide, according to my conscience, that it is impossible that the sheep should have forborne to eat the fowls. the sheep shall accordingly be put to death. its carcass shall be given to the court, and its fleece be taken by the plaintiff."