but the next day, and the next, and the next brought me no solution to the problem. the weather had turned cold and for a time there was a slushy snow on the ground, which made the matter of job-hunting all the worse. those fierce youths in the anterooms were no more kindly on the second and fifth days than they had been on the first. but by now, in addition to becoming decidedly dour, i was becoming a little angry. it seemed to me to be the height of discourtesy, not to say rank brutality, for newspapers, and especially those which boasted a social and humanitarian leadership of their fellows in american life, to place such unsophisticated and blatant and ill-trained upstarts between themselves and the general public, men and women of all shades and degrees of intelligence who might have to come in contact with them. h. l. mencken has written: “the average american newspaper, especially the so-called better sort, has the intelligence of a baptist evangelist, the courage of a rat, the fairness of a prohibitionist boob-bumper, the information of a high-school janitor, the taste of a designer of celluloid valentines, and the honor of a police-station lawyer.” judging by some of my experiences and observations, i would be willing to subscribe to this. the unwarranted and unnecessary airs! the grand assumption of wisdom! the heartless and brutal nature of their internal economies, their pandering to the cheapest of all public instincts and tendencies in search of circulation!
after several days i made up my mind to see the city editor of these papers, regardless of hall boys. and so, going one day at one o’clock to the world, i started to walk right in, but, being intercepted as usual, lost my courage and retreated. however, as i have since thought, perhaps this was fortunate, for going downstairs i meditated most grievously as to my failure, my lack of skill and courage in carrying out my intention. so thoroughly did i castigate myself that i recovered my nerve and returned. i reëntered the small office, and finding two of the youths still on hand and waiting to intercept me, brushed them both aside as one might flies, opened the much-guarded door and walked in.
to my satisfaction, while they followed me and by threats and force attempted to persuade me to retreat, i gazed upon one of the most interesting city reportorial and editorial rooms that i have ever beheld. it was forty or fifty feet wide by a hundred or more deep, and lighted, even by day in this gray weather, by a blaze of lights. the entire space from front to back was filled with desks. a varied company of newspaper men, most of them in shirt-sleeves, were hard at work. in the forward part of the room, near the door by which i had entered, and upon a platform, were several desks, at which three or four men were seated—the throne, as i quickly learned, of the city editor and his assistants. two of these, as i could see, were engaged in reading and marking papers. a third, who looked as though he might be the city editor, was consulting with several men at his desk. copy boys were ambling to and fro. from somewhere came the constant click-click-click of telegraph instruments and the howl of “coppee!” i think i should have been forced to retire had it not been for the fact that as i was standing there, threatened and pleaded with by my two adversaries, a young man (since distinguished in the journalistic world, arthur brisbane) who was passing through the room looked at me curiously and inquired courteously:
“what is it you want?”
“i want,” i said, half-angered by the spectacle i was making and that was being made of me, “a job.”
“where do you come from?”
“the west.”
“wait a moment,” he said, and the youths, seeing that i had attracted his attention, immediately withdrew. he went toward the man at the desk whom i had singled out as the city editor, and turned and pointed to me. “this young man wants a job. i wish you would give him one.”
the man nodded, and my remarkable interrogator, turning to me, said, “just wait here,” and disappeared.
i did not know quite what to think, so astonished was i, but with each succeeding moment my spirits rose, and by the time the city editor chose to motion me to him i was in a very exalted state indeed. so much for courage, i told myself. surely i was fortunate, for had i not been dreaming for months—years—of coming to new york and after great deprivation and difficulty perhaps securing a position? and now of a sudden here i was thus swiftly vaulted into the very position which of all others i had most craved. surely this must be the influence of a star of fortune. surely now if i had the least trace of ability, i should be in a better position than i had ever been in before. i looked about the great room, as i waited patiently and delightedly, and saw pasted on the walls at intervals printed cards which read: accuracy, accuracy, accuracy! who? what? where? when? how? the facts—the color—the facts! i knew what those signs meant: the proper order for beginning a newspaper story. another sign insisted upon promptness, courtesy, geniality! most excellent traits, i thought, but not as easy to put into execution as comfortable publishers and managing editors might suppose.
presently i was called over and told to take a seat, after being told: “i’ll have an assignment for you after a while.” that statement meant work, an opportunity, a salary. i felt myself growing apace, only the eye and the glance of my immediate superior was by no means cheering or genial. this man was holding a difficult position, one of the most difficult in newspaperdom in america at the time, and under one of the most eccentric and difficult of publishers, joseph pulitzer.
this same pulitzer, whom alleyne ireland subsequently characterized in so brilliant a fashion as to make this brief sketch trivial and unimportant save for its service here as a link in this tale, was a brilliant and eccentric magyar jew, long since famous for his journalistic genius. at that time he must have been between fifty-five and sixty years of age, semi-dyspeptic and half-blind, having almost wrecked himself physically, or so i understood, in a long and grueling struggle to ascend to preeminence in the american newspaper world. he was the chief owner, as i understood, of not only the new york world but the st. louis post-dispatch, the then afternoon paper of largest circulation and influence in that city. while i was in st. louis the air of that newspaper world was surcharged or still rife with this remarkable publisher’s past exploits—how once, when he was starting in the newspaper world as a publisher, he had been horsewhipped by some irate citizen for having published some derogatory item, and, having tamely submitted to the castigation, had then rushed into his sanctum and given orders that an extra should be issued detailing the attack in order that the news value might not be lost to the counting-room. similarly, one of his st. louis city or managing editors (one colonel cockerill by name, who at this very time or a very little later was still one of the managing editors of the new york world) had, after conducting some campaign of exposure against a local citizen by order of his chief, and being confronted in his office by the same, evidently come to punish him, drawn a revolver and killed him.
that was a part of what might have been called the makings of this great newspaper figure. here in new york, after his arrival on the scene in 1884, at which time he had taken over a moribund journal called the world, he had literally succeeded in turning things upside down, much as did william randolph hearst after him, and as had charles a. dana and others before him. like all aggressive newspaper men worthy the name, he had seized upon every possible vital issue and attacked, attacked, attacked—tammany hall, wall street (then defended by the sun and the herald), the house of morgan, some phases of society, and many other features and conditions of the great city. for one thing, he had cut the price of his paper to one cent, a move which was reported to have infuriated his conservative and quiescent rivals, who were getting two, three and five and who did not wish to be disturbed in their peaceful pursuits. the sun in particular, which had been made by the brilliant and daring eccentricity of dana and his earlier radicalism, and the herald, which originally owed its growth and fame to the monopoly-fighting skill of bennett, were now both grown conservative and mutually attacked him as low, vulgar, indecent and the like, an upstart jew whose nose was in every putrescent dunghill, ratting out filth for the consumption of the dregs of society. but is it not always so when any one arises who wishes to break through from submersion or nothingness into the white light of power and influence? do not the resultant quakes always infuriate those who have ceased growing or are at least comfortably quiescent and who do not wish to be disturbed?
just the same, this man, because of his vital, aggressive, restless, working mood, and his vaulting ambition to be all that there was to be of journalistic force in america, was making a veritable hell of his paper and the lives of those who worked for him. and although he himself was not present at the time but was sailing around the world on a yacht, or living in a villa on the riviera, or at bar harbor, or in his town house in new york or london, you could feel the feverish and disturbing and distressing ionic tang of his presence in this room as definitely as though he were there in the flesh. air fairly sizzled with the ionic rays of this black star. of secretaries to this editor-publisher and traveling with him at the time but coming back betimes to nose about the paper and cause woe to others, there were five. of sons, by no means in active charge but growing toward eventual control, two. of managing editors, all slipping about and, as the newspaper men seemed to think, spying on each other, at one time as many as seven. he had so little faith in his fellow-man, and especially such of his fellow-men as were so unfortunate as to have to work for him, that he played off one against another as might have the council of the secret ten in venice, or as did the devils who ruled in the vatican in the middle ages. every man’s hand, as i came to know in the course of time, was turned against that of every other. all were thoroughly distrustful of each other and feared the incessant spying that was going on. each, as i was told and as to a certain extent one could feel, was made to believe that he was the important one, or might be, presuming that he could prove that the others were failures or in error. proposed editorials, suggestions for news features, directions as to policy and what not, were coming in from him every hour via cable or telegraph. nearly every issue of any importance was being submitted to him by the same means. he was, as described by this same alleyne ireland, undoubtedly semi-neurasthenic, a disease-demonized soul, who could scarcely control himself in anything, a man who was fighting an almost insane battle with life itself, trying to be omnipotent and what not else, and never to die.
but in regard to the men working here how sharp a sword of disaster seemed suspended above them by a thread, the sword of dismissal or of bitter reprimand or contempt. they had a kind of nervous, resentful terror in their eyes as have animals when they are tortured. all were either scribbling busily or hurrying in or out. every man was for himself. if you had asked a man a question, as i ventured to do while sitting here, not knowing anything of how things were done here, he looked at you as though you were a fool, or as though you were trying to take something away from him or cause him trouble of some kind. in the main they hustled by or went on with their work without troubling to pay the slightest attention to you. i had never encountered anything like it before, and only twice afterwards in my life did i find anything which even partially approximated it, and both times in new york. after the peace and ease of pittsburgh—god! but it was immense, just the same—terrific.