my darling barbara alexievna,—thank god that he has sent you a chance of repaying my good with good. i believe in so doing, as well as in the sweetness of your angelic heart. therefore, i will not reproach you. only i pray you, do not again blame me because in the decline of my life i have played the spendthrift. it was such a sin, was it not?—such a thing to do? and even if you would still have it that the sin was there, remember, little friend, what it costs me to hear such words fall from your lips. do not be vexed with me for saying this, for my heart is fainting. poor people are subject to fancies—this is a provision of nature. i myself have had reason to know this. the poor man is exacting. he cannot see god’s world as it is, but eyes each passer-by askance, and looks around him uneasily in order that he may listen to every word that is being uttered. may not people be talking of him? how is it that he is so unsightly? what is he feeling at all? what sort of figure is he cutting on the one side or on the other? it is matter of common knowledge, my barbara, that the poor man ranks lower than a rag, and will never earn the respect of any one. yes, write about him as you like—let scribblers say what they choose about him—he will ever remain as he was. and why is this? it is because, from his very nature, the poor man has to wear his feelings on his sleeve, so that nothing about him is sacred, and as for his self-respect—! well, emelia told me the other day that once, when he had to collect subscriptions, official sanction was demanded for every single coin, since people thought that it would be no use paying their money to a poor man. nowadays charity is strangely administered. perhaps it has always been so. either folk do not know how to administer it, or they are adept in the art—one of the two. perhaps you did not know this, so i beg to tell it you. and how comes it that the poor man knows, is so conscious of it all? the answer is—by experience. he knows because any day he may see a gentleman enter a restaurant and ask himself, “what shall i have to eat today? i will have such and such a dish,” while all the time the poor man will have nothing to eat that day but gruel. there are men, too—wretched busybodies—who walk about merely to see if they can find some wretched tchinovnik or broken-down official who has got toes projecting from his boots or his hair uncut! and when they have found such a one they make a report of the circumstance, and their rubbish gets entered on the file.... but what does it matter to you if my hair lacks the shears? if you will forgive me what may seem to you a piece of rudeness, i declare that the poor man is ashamed of such things with the sensitiveness of a young girl. you, for instance, would not care (pray pardon my bluntness) to unrobe yourself before the public eye; and in the same way, the poor man does not like to be pried at or questioned concerning his family relations, and so forth. a man of honour and self-respect such as i am finds it painful and grievous to have to consort with men who would deprive him of both.

today i sat before my colleagues like a bear’s cub or a plucked sparrow, so that i fairly burned with shame. yes, it hurt me terribly, barbara. naturally one blushes when one can see one’s naked toes projecting through one’s boots, and one’s buttons hanging by a single thread! as though on purpose, i seemed, on this occasion, to be peculiarly dishevelled. no wonder that my spirits fell. when i was talking on business matters to stepan karlovitch, he suddenly exclaimed, for no apparent reason, “ah, poor old makar alexievitch!” and then left the rest unfinished. but i knew what he had in his mind, and blushed so hotly that even the bald patch on my head grew red. of course the whole thing is nothing, but it worries me, and leads to anxious thoughts. what can these fellows know about me? god send that they know nothing! but i confess that i suspect, i strongly suspect, one of my colleagues. let them only betray me! they would betray one’s private life for a groat, for they hold nothing sacred.

i have an idea who is at the bottom of it all. it is rataziaev. probably he knows someone in our department to whom he has recounted the story with additions. or perhaps he has spread it abroad in his own department, and thence, it has crept and crawled into ours. everyone here knows it, down to the last detail, for i have seen them point at you with their fingers through the window. oh yes, i have seen them do it. yesterday, when i stepped across to dine with you, the whole crew were hanging out of the window to watch me, and the landlady exclaimed that the devil was in young people, and called you certain unbecoming names. but this is as nothing compared with rataziaev’s foul intention to place us in his books, and to describe us in a satire. he himself has declared that he is going to do so, and other people say the same. in fact, i know not what to think, nor what to decide. it is no use concealing the fact that you and i have sinned against the lord god.... you were going to send me a book of some sort, to divert my mind—were you not, dearest? what book, though, could now divert me? only such books as have never existed on earth. novels are rubbish, and written for fools and for the idle. believe me, dearest, i know it through long experience. even should they vaunt shakespeare to you, i tell you that shakespeare is rubbish, and proper only for lampoons—your own,

makar dievushkin.